Insights from the reanalysis of high-throughput chemical genomics data for Escherichia coli K-12 is a dataset published in G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.123, placing it in the top 71.3% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 67/100.
Ranks in the top 71% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The paper gives a DOI for the supplementary material, which is a persistent identifier scheme. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“figshare”
The paper names figshare as the repository for the supplementary material, which is a curated archive that issues accessions and commits to retention. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The dataset's identifier (DOI) appears only in the body text (Data Availability Statement), not as a reference-list entry.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The code and data files used for calculations and reproducing the results are available on GitHub: https://github.com/peterwu19881230/Systematic-analyses-ecoli-phenotypes . Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The statement points to a repository record (figshare with DOI) and a code repository, fitting Colavizza category 3. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The code and data files used for calculations and reproducing the results are available on GitHub: https://github.com/peterwu19881230/Systematic-analyses-ecoli-phenotypes . Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The dataset is described only in running prose; no section, table, or enumerated list itemizes files or variables. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The code and data files used for calculations and reproducing the results are available on GitHub: https://github.com/peterwu19881230/Systematic-analyses-ecoli-phenotypes . Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The data are stated to be available at public repositories (GitHub and figshare) with no precondition, embargo, or registration requirement mentioned.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The code and data files used for calculations and reproducing the results are available on GitHub: https://github.com/peterwu19881230/Systematic-analyses-ecoli-phenotypes . Supplementary material is available at figshare DOI: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13350674 .”
The paper describes the action of obtaining the data (from GitHub and figshare) but does not apply an explicit access-level label such as 'open access' from the controlled vocabulary. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper does not mention any sensitive or human-subject data, and no gatekeeper of any kind is named for the released data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence in the paper states how long the data will remain available or makes any persistence commitment. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format token (e.g., CSV, FASTQ) is mentioned for the released data; the paper only describes the code in R, not the format of the data files.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, ISA-Tab, GO) is named as being applied to the paper's own data; GO is used for annotation but not as a standard for the data itself.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (DOI, accession, RRID) for any external resource other than the paper's own dataset appears in the text; references to other studies are bare citations without identifiers.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence or terms of use are explicitly stated for the data; the article's CC-BY licence applies to the publication, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date is provided to identify the snapshot of the data; the figshare DOI may be versioned but the paper does not mention a version.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“The code and data files used for calculations and reproducing the results are available on GitHub: https://github.com/peterwu19881230/Systematic-analyses-ecoli-phenotypes”
A machine-resolvable locator (GitHub URL) is given for the study's own code, which is a code-forge repository.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01GM089636) to J.C.H.”
An award number (R01GM089636) is provided, attached to a named funder (NIH).
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“MI for quantitative data was calculated using the cminjk() function provided in the mpmi package”
The paper names specific software (mpmi package, GOSemSim package, etc.) used to produce the reanalysis results, which are the study's own data products. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No README, data dictionary, or codebook is named as accompanying the deposited data; the paper does not describe any documentation object.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0188
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 1 citer.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01GM089636
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01GM089636-06
An Ontology for Microbial Phenotypes
FWCI
0.07
Citation Percentile
0.4%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals