Mutation impact on mRNA versus protein expression across human cancers is a research paper published in GigaScience (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.208. It has been cited 3 times. Its calibrated FAIR score is 80/100.
BackgroundCancer mutations are often assumed to alter proteins, thus promoting tumorigenesis. However, how mutations affect protein expression-in addition to gene expression-has rarely been systematically investigated. This is significant as mRNA and protein levels frequently show only moderate correlation, driven by factors such as translation efficiency and protein degradation. Proteogenomic datasets from large tumor cohorts provide an opportunity to systematically analyze the effects of somatic mutations on mRNA and protein abundance and identify mutations with distinct impacts on these molecular levels.ResultsWe conduct a comprehensive analysis of mutation impacts on mRNA- and protein-level expressions of 953 cancer cases with paired genomics and global proteomic profiling across 6 cancer types. Protein-level impacts are validated for 47.2% of the somatic expression quantitative trait loci (seQTLs), including CDH1 and MSH3 truncations, as well as other mutations from likely "long-tail" driver genes. Devising a statistical pipeline for identifying somatic protein-specific QTLs (spsQTLs), we reveal several gene mutations, including NF1 and MAP2K4 truncations and TP53 missenses showing disproportional influence on protein abundance not readily explained by transcriptomics. Cross-validating with data from massively parallel assays of variant effects (MAVE), TP53 missenses associated with high tumor TP53 proteins are more likely to be experimentally confirmed as functional.ConclusionThis study reveals that somatic mutations can exhibit distinct impacts on mRNA and protein levels, underscoring the necessity of integrating proteogenomic data to comprehensively identify functionally significant cancer mutations. These insights provide a framework for prioritizing mutations for further functional validation and therapeutic targeting.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.208
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.