Cohort Profile: Dementia Risk Prediction Project (DRPP) is a dataset published in International Journal of Epidemiology (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.241, placing it in the top 61.3% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 33/100.
Ranks in the top 61% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“please visit our website at drpp.northwestern.edu”
The paper gives a URL for the data location, not a persistent identifier scheme. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“please visit our website at drpp.northwestern.edu”
The data are held on a project website, not a named repository.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“To apply for permission to access our data on our secure portal, please visit our website at drpp.northwestern.edu.”
The dataset identifier (the website URL) appears only in the body text, not in the reference list. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Investigators can apply for use of the DRPP data or review the data documentation at drpp.northwestern.edu.”
The statement points to a project website with an application process, not a repository record. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Supplementary Table S11. DRPP harmonized variables and domains.”
The paper includes a table listing the variables in the harmonized dataset, which is an itemised inventory.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“To apply for permission to access our data on our secure portal, please visit our website at drpp.northwestern.edu.”
Access requires an application process, which is a specified precondition.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Approved collaborators will have access to a data set on the virtual computing platform built specifically for the DRPP.”
The paper describes the access procedure but does not label the access level with a standard term.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Output is then reviewed by the Northwestern DRPP team to confirm that no individual-level data leave our server.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names an institutional gatekeeper (the Northwestern DRPP team) that reviews output before release, constituting a controlled-access procedure. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
DSM-IV is a community-standard diagnostic vocabulary used for the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for any external resource (e.g., another dataset, database, or code) is provided.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence or terms of use are stated for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to identify the snapshot of the data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper names the R package but provides no locator (URL, DOI, or repository) for it.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“1R61NS120245-01/R33NS120245”
The paper provides specific grant numbers for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“our team developed an R package titled ‘psHarmonize’.”
The paper names the specific software tool used for data harmonization. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Supplementary Table S11. DRPP harmonized variables and domains.”
The variable definitions are provided inside the article as a supplementary table, not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92022D00004
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: HHSN268201200036C
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066546
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG054076
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG059421
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG079108
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: RF1 AG063507
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00005
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92021D00006
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC85079
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: P30 DK092926
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG030153
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG058969
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 HL080295
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92019D00031
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG068410
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS102715
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U01 AG052409
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00001
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00002
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00007
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92022D00001
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: HHSN268201800001C
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC55222
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC85086
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95160
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95167
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG049607
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG066524
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG082360
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS085002
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: U01 NS125513
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: UF1 NS125513
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00003
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00004
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92020D00006
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92022D00005
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC25195
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95161
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95169
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG054069
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG068629
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R33 NS120245
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: RF1 NS085002
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 HL096812
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR001079
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: HHSN268200800007C
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: HHSN268201500003I
Medical Research Council
Grant: MR/S011676/1
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95164
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95166
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95168
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG020098
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL105756
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R61 NS120245
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR000040
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR001420
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: HHSN268201500001I
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95159
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95163
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG023629
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG059727
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS017950
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U01 AG058589
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92022D00002
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: 75N92022D00003
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01 HC085081
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC85080
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC85082
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC85083
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95162
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: N01HC95165
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072947
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG070953
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 HL130114
U.S. National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
National Institute on Aging
National Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke
FWCI
1.14
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008