Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association(2020)10.1093/jamia/ocaa245Source: DataRank Database

Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data is a dataset published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 3.3, placing it in the top 6.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 95 times, with 90 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

Top 7%percentile

3.3DataRank

Ranks in the top 7% for downstream scientific impact

Data paper Open Access95 citations · 90 citing works in its network

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

doi

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (10 grants)OA: hybridTopics (27)Linked Datasets (2)DataCite Reuse (2)IDs (PubMed, PMC)Annotations (1)SDGs (1)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (1/3)

Dataset classification

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 21%Citation Network 79%

Base Score Contribution

0.685

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

2.6

From 61 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 5 citers driving the network score

Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(C_q) divided by its reference count — out of 90 citers.

Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association202176 citations36 referencesContributes 0.121
Data quality and timeliness analysis for post-vaccination adverse event cases reported through healthcare data exchange to FDA BEST pilot platform
Frontiers in Public Health20243 citations13 referencesContributes 0.107
Tailoring Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (PCORnet) Common Data Model (CDM).
PubMed20227 citations20 referencesContributes 0.104
INSIGHT : A Tool for Fit‐for‐Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Standardized Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety20253 citations14 referencesContributes 0.099
Clustering analysis of geriatric and acute characteristics in a cohort of very old patients on admission to ICU
Intensive Care Medicine202232 citations37 referencesContributes 0.095

Authors (12)

Tianchen Lyu ORCID,Alexander Loiacono,Tonatiuh Mendoza Viramontes,Gloria Lipori ORCID,Yi Guo ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:33166397 PMC:PMC7727392

National Institutes of Health

Grant: UL1TR001427

National Institutes of Health

Grant: R01CA246418

National Institutes of Health

Grant: R21AG068717

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Grant: PCORI ME-2018C3-14754

OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium

Grant: CDRN-1501-26692

NIA NIH HHS

Grant: P30 AG028740

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 1R21AG068717-01

Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical Trials

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5R01CA246418-04

The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in Florida

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5UL1TR001427-08

Together: Transforming and Translating Discovery to Improve Health

University of Florida’s Creating the Healthiest Generation—Moonshot

Influential Citations

hybridLicense: cc-by

HYBRIDhttps://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/27/12/1999/34838730/ocaa245.pdf

publisherhttps://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/27/12/1999/34838730/ocaa245.pdf

publisherhttp://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/27/12/1999/34838730/ocaa245.pdf

repositoryhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7727392

Europe_PMChttps://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7727392

Fields of Study

MedicineComputer Science03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering02 engineering and technologyBiomedical ResearchData AccuracyElectronic Health RecordsHumansInformation Systems

MeSH Terms

HumansBiomedical ResearchInformation SystemsElectronic Health RecordsData Accuracy

Keywords

Electronic Health RecordReal-world DataClinical Data Research NetworkPcornetData Quality AssessmentBiomedical ResearchReviewsElectronic Health RecordsHumansData AccuracyInformation Systems

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3: 3. Good health

Additional file 1 of Data completeness and consistency in individual medical records of institutional births: retrospective crossectional study from Northwest Ethiopia, 2022

10.6084/m9.figshare.26634504.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Data completeness and consistency in individual medical records of institutional births: retrospective crossectional study from Northwest Ethiopia, 2022

10.6084/m9.figshare.26634504figshare