The application of artificial intelligence and data integration in COVID-19 studies: a scoping review is a dataset published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.9, placing it in the top 11.3% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 50 times, with 50 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 11% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper declares that no new data were generated, so there is no dataset to identify with a persistent identifier.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
Since no new data were generated, no repository is named as the holder.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No dataset identifier appears anywhere because no dataset was generated.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The data availability statement explicitly states that no new data were generated, which is a statement of unavailability.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No dataset exists, so no itemised inventory or description of data is provided.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper states no new data were generated, so there is no access route to data.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper declares that no new data were generated, so no access level label is provided.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper does not involve human-subject data, and no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No persistence commitment or availability timing is stated because no data were generated.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No file format is named for the data because no data were generated.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline”
The paper uses PRISMA, a manuscript reporting guideline, not a data or metadata standard. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper is a review and does not generate data that depend on other resources; no external resource identifiers are given for the data's dependencies. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No reuse license is attached to the data because no data were generated.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No version token or date is stated for the data because no dataset exists. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
The paper does not mention any code written for this review; no code locator is provided.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Drs Guo and Bian were funded in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Award number: R01 CA246418, R21 CA245858, R21 AG068717, R21 CA253394) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Award number: U18 DP006512).”
The paper includes specific NIH and CDC award numbers in the funding statement. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No production record is given because no data were produced. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“No new data were generated in support of this research.”
No documentation object accompanies the data because no data exist. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.590
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
1.3
From 35 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 50 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 CA246418
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21 CA245858
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21 AG068717
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R21 CA253394
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Grant: U18 DP006512
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R21CA245858-01A1S1
Examine the risk of Alzheimer's disease in sexual and gender minorities
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R21CA253394-01A1
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Cancer Trials
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R21AG068717-01
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical Trials
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01CA246418-04
The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in Florida
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U18DP006512-03
Using Real-world Data to Assess the Burden of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents in Florida
FWCI
5.33
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals