Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study is a research paper published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.457. It has been cited 20 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.457
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: NCATU01TR001806
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: U01 TR001806
Electronic Health Record Access to Seamless Integration of PROMIS
FWCI
2.85
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study
Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study
Additional file 1 of Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
Additional file 1 of Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
Additional file 4 of Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
Additional file 4 of Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review
Additional file 1 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 1 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 3 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 3 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 4 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 4 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 5 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 5 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 2 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study
Additional file 2 of Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice—a qualitative post-implementation study