Enhancing research data infrastructure to address the opioid epidemic: the Opioid Overdose Network (O2-Net) is a dataset published in JAMIA Open (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.391, placing it in the top 46.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 8 times, with 3 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 47% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) is given for the data; only a prose location.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No repository is named; the data are held by the principal investigator.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper; the data are not cited as a reference or in the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data-availability statement points to a person (Colavizza category 1). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No itemised inventory of the dataset exists; the only sentence about data is the availability statement. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only route is a discretionary request to a person, which is not a followable access route.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not label the access level of the data; it only states that data are available on written request. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are sensitive (human subjects) and the only gatekeeper named is a natural person (the principal investigator). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No persistence commitment or availability timing is stated for the data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“The specific ICD-10 codes used to classify cases as shown in Supplementary Appendix Table S2.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
ICD-10 is a community standard vocabulary applied to the e-phenotype data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for any non-own resource is given; only references to literature and standard methods.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“Data underlying the analyses described in this paper are available on written request from the principal investigator, LAL, MD ([email protected]).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No license is mentioned for the data; the paper's CC BY license applies to the article only.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to pin a snapshot of the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“NLP tools were then modified for installation using Docker and distributed to other sites in the consortium.”
The code is distributed but not publicly available via a resolvable locator.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This publication [or project] was supported, in part, by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Grant Numbers U01TR002628, UL1TR001450, UL1TR001998, UL1TR001442, and UL1TR001086.”
Grant numbers are provided for the funding. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“using the CLAMP platform”
A specific tool (CLAMP) is named for generating the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The specific ICD-10 codes used to classify cases as shown in Supplementary Appendix Table S2.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions (ICD-10 codes) are provided inside the article in a supplementary table, but no documentation object is shipped with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.330
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0613
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 3 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U01TR002628
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UL1TR001450
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UL1TR001998
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UL1TR001442
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UL1TR001086
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 DA029926
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UL1TR001086-03
SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational Science
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UL1TR001450-06S1
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2UL1TR001442-06
UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research Institute
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01TR002628-05
Enhancing Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Research to Address the Opioid Epidemic
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UL1TR001998-02
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals