Exploring beyond diagnoses in electronic health records to improve discovery: a review of the phenome-wide association study is a dataset published in JAMIA Open (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.379, placing it in the top 47.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 5 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 21/100.
Ranks in the top 48% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier in a recognized scheme (DOI, Handle, accession) for its own dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The collected data and materials used during the current review are all available in this review.”
The data are held within the article itself, not in a named repository.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text; the paper's DOI is for the article, not the data.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The collected data and materials used during the current review are all available in this review. Analytic code can also be found in the supplementary materials.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to the article and supplementary materials, which is Colavizza category 2 (data within the article). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“We gathered and organized the following data from each study: exposures, phenotypic data, cohort details, sample size, study objectives, phenotypes of interest, associated clinical terminologies, replication status, and cohort ancestry.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The description of the dataset is given in running prose in the methods, not as an itemised inventory with a section heading, table, or list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The collected data and materials used during the current review are all available in this review.”
The data are stated to be available in the review with no precondition such as registration or embargo.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not assign any access-level label (e.g., 'open access', 'embargoed') to the review's own data; it merely states that the data are 'available in this review.' [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The study is a literature review and does not involve sensitive or human-subject data, so no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data are available or how long they persist. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, Dublin Core, an ontology) is named for the collected data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide identifiers for the source articles that make up the data; references are listed but not as part of the dataset.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper's CC BY license applies to the article, not to the data; the scope rule prohibits crediting the article's CC-BY footer for data licensing. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the dataset.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Analytic code can also be found in the supplementary materials.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The code is in supplementary materials, which is a non-authoritative location (class 2). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant numbers R01AG084550, R01HL171809, R01HG012748, K01 HL157755, R01 HL133786, R01 GM139891, R01AG069900, U01 HG011181, P50HD106446, and R01 LM012806.”
Award numbers are provided for the funder.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“we utilized packages in Python for data visualization.”
The tools used are described in generic terms ('packages in Python') rather than naming specific instruments or software versions. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“We gathered and organized the following data from each study: exposures, phenotypic data, cohort details, sample size, study objectives, phenotypes of interest, associated clinical terminologies, replication status, and cohort ancestry.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided inside the article prose, not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.110
From 3 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 5 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01AG084550
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01HL171809
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01HG012748
National Institutes of Health
Grant: K01 HL157755
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 HL133786
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 GM139891
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01AG069900
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U01 HG011181
National Institutes of Health
Grant: P50HD106446
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 LM012806
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: T32 GM007347
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: T32 GM152284
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R56 AG084550
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01AG069900-01
Drug repositioning for Alzheimer's disease via genetics, electronic health records, and human iPSC models
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01AG084550-01A1
Systematically screening and validating drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01HG011181-05
Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records (VGER) Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01GM139891-02
PheMAP: Measured, Automated Profile to Facilitate High Throughput Phenotyping
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01LM012806-01
Predicting Phenotype by Using Transcriptomic Alteration as Endophenotype
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01HG012748-01A1
Learning Precision Medicine for Rare Diseases Empowered by Knowledge-driven Data Mining
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5K01HL157755-02
Tissue-specific functional genomics in the acute respiratory distress syndrome
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P50HD106446-01
Vanderbilt Integrated Center of Excellence in Maternal and Pediatric Precision Therapeutics (VICE-MPRINT)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01HL171809-01
Targeting Residual ASCVD Risk by Integrating Genetics and Clinical Data
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HL133786-02
Exploring Statin Pleiotropic Effects within a Very Large EHR Cohort
FWCI
1.95
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords