Large-scale meta–genome-wide association study reveals common genetic factors linked to radiation-induced acute toxicities across cancer types is a dataset published in JNCI Cancer Spectrum (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.843, placing it in the top 23.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 19 times, with 13 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 27/100.
Ranks in the top 24% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Summary statistics for GWAS results will be available to download from the GWAS Catalog.”
The paper does not provide any PID string for the dataset; it only states that summary statistics will be available from the GWAS Catalog.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Summary statistics for GWAS results will be available to download from the GWAS Catalog.”
The paper names the GWAS Catalog as the repository where the data will be deposited.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
The dataset's identifier does not appear anywhere in the paper. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data availability This study was done using cohorts involved in the Radiogenomics Consortium. Summary statistics for GWAS results will be available to download from the GWAS Catalog.”
The data availability statement points to the GWAS Catalog but without a specific identifier or link.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper contains no itemised inventory of the dataset's files, variables, or samples.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Summary statistics for GWAS results will be available to download from the GWAS Catalog.”
The text states future availability without a specified date or precondition, which is not a current unconditional route. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“No access-level label is applied.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not use any standard access-rights vocabulary or natural-language label for the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are not sensitive human-subject data, and no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Summary statistics for GWAS results will be available to download from the GWAS Catalog.”
The paper states that the data will be available in the future but does not specify how long they will persist. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not mention any file format for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not explicitly name a data or metadata community standard applied to the dataset.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for any external resource that the data depend on. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper does not mention a license for the data; the article's CC-BY-NC license does not apply to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not provide a version token for the study's dataset.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide any locator for the study's own code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“REQUITE received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement No. 601826.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper lists multiple grant numbers, including EU grant agreement No. 601826. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“SNVs were imputed on the Michigan Imputation Server using the Haplotype Reference Consortium, release 1.1 2016 reference panel or IMPUTE2 software”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific software and platforms used for genotyping and imputation. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
The paper does not mention any documentation object like a README or codebook accompanying the data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.449
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.393
From 8 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 13 citers.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: NIHR203805
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 201237/Z/16/Z
Cancer Research UK
Grant: 25351
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: CL-2022-25-007
European Commission
Grant: 634935
Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing (BRIDGES)
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 201237
Vitamin D and head and neck cancer risk and progression: An examination of causality and mechanisms.
European Commission
Grant: 601826
Validating predictive models of radiotherapy toxicity to improve quality-of-life and reduce side-effects in cancer survivors
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
National Medical Research Council
Cancer Research UK
The Taylor Family Foundation
Wellcome Trust
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals