🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

GMrepo v2: a curated human gut microbiome database with special focus on disease markers and cross-dataset comparison

Nucleic Acids Research(2021)10.1093/nar/gkab1019Source: DataRank Database

GMrepo v2: a curated human gut microbiome database with special focus on disease markers and cross-dataset comparison is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 4.7, placing it in the top 29% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 181 times, with 174 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 56/100.

Top 29%percentile
4.7DataRank
4.7Top 29%
Dataset Open Access181 citations · base score 5.1
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

GMrepo (data repository for Gut Microbiota) is a database of curated and consistently annotated human gut metagenomes. Its main purposes are to increase the reusability and accessibility of human gut metagenomic data, and enable cross-project and phenotype comparisons. To achieve these goals, we performed manual curation on the meta-data and organized the datasets in a phenotype-centric manner. GMrepo v2 contains 353 projects and 71,642 runs/samples, which are significantly increased from the previous version. Among these runs/samples, 45,111 and 26,531 were obtained by 16S rRNA amplicon and whole-genome metagenomics sequencing, respectively. We also increased the number of phenotypes from 92 to 133. In addition, we introduced disease-marker identification and cross-project/phenotype comparison. We first identified disease markers between two phenotypes (e.g. health versus diseases) on a per-project basis for selected projects. We then compared the identified markers for each phenotype pair across datasets to facilitate the identification of consistent microbial markers across datasets. Finally, we provided a marker-centric view to allow users to check if a marker has different trends in different diseases. So far, GMrepo includes 592 marker taxa (350 species and 242 genera) for 47 phenotype pairs, identified from 83 selected projects. GMrepo v2 is freely available at: https://gmrepo.humangut.info.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    56FAIR score
    F Findable
    78
    A Accessible
    68
    I Interoperable
    38
    R Reusable
    42
    Top 9% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 16%Citation Network 84%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.767

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    3.9

    From 128 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
      Nature Methods201635,281 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
      Genome Biology201116,383 citationsDataRank 1.5
    3. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome
      Nature20117,570 citationsDataRank 1.3
    4. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota
      Nature20191,363 citationsDataRank 1.1
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 16% comes from its base citations and 84% from the citation network (128 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (11)

    Related Papers (10)

    Nucleic Acids Research(2019)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1093/nar/gkz764
    Genome Biology(2019)
    co-cited
    10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0
    Nature Methods(2018)
    co-cited
    10.1038/s41592-018-0141-9
    Bioinformatics(2018)
    co-cited
    10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560