🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

HMDB 5.0: the Human Metabolome Database for 2022

Nucleic Acids Research(2021)10.1093/nar/gkab1062Source: DataRank Database

HMDB 5.0: the Human Metabolome Database for 2022 is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 8.8, placing it in the top 23.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 2,377 times, with 189 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 70/100.

Top 23%percentile
8.8DataRank
8.8Top 23%
Dataset Open Access2377 citations · base score 7.7
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

The Human Metabolome Database or HMDB (https://hmdb.ca) has been providing comprehensive reference information about human metabolites and their associated biological, physiological and chemical properties since 2007. Over the past 15 years, the HMDB has grown and evolved significantly to meet the needs of the metabolomics community and respond to continuing changes in internet and computing technology. This year's update, HMDB 5.0, brings a number of important improvements and upgrades to the database. These should make the HMDB more useful and more appealing to a larger cross-section of users. In particular, these improvements include: (i) a significant increase in the number of metabolite entries (from 114 100 to 217 920 compounds); (ii) enhancements to the quality and depth of metabolite descriptions; (iii) the addition of new structure, spectral and pathway visualization tools; (iv) the inclusion of many new and much more accurately predicted spectral data sets, including predicted NMR spectra, more accurately predicted MS spectra, predicted retention indices and predicted collision cross section data and (v) enhancements to the HMDB's search functions to facilitate better compound identification. Many other minor improvements and updates to the content, the interface, and general performance of the HMDB website have also been made. Overall, we believe these upgrades and updates should greatly enhance the HMDB's ease of use and its potential applications not only in human metabolomics but also in exposomics, lipidomics, nutritional science, biochemistry and clinical chemistry.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    70FAIR score
    F Findable
    90
    A Accessible
    80
    I Interoperable
    50
    R Reusable
    58
    Top 1% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 13%Citation Network 87%

    Base Score Contribution

    1.2

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    7.7

    From 189 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 13% comes from its base citations and 87% from the citation network (189 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (39)

    AnChi Guo,Eponine Oler,Fei WangORCID,Afia AnjumORCID,Harrison Peters

    Related Papers (9)

    Nucleic Acids Research(2019)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1093/nar/gkz764
    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal(2022)
    co-cited
    10.1016/j.csbj.2022.02.003
    The American Journal of Psychology(1904)
    co-cited
    10.2307/1412159
    Journal of Educational Psychology(1933)
    co-cited
    10.1037/h0071325