🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

CeDR Atlas: a knowledgebase of cellular drug response

Nucleic Acids Research(2021)10.1093/nar/gkab897Source: DataRank Database

CeDR Atlas: a knowledgebase of cellular drug response is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.2, placing it in the top 40.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 42 times, with 33 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 48/100.

Top 40%percentile
1.2DataRank
1.2Top 40%
Dataset Open Access42 citations · base score 3.6
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Drug response to many diseases varies dramatically due to the complex genomics and functional features and contexts. Cellular diversity of human tissues, especially tumors, is one of the major contributing factors to the different drug response in different samples. With the accumulation of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, it is now possible to study the drug response to different treatments at the single cell resolution. Here, we present CeDR Atlas (available at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/cedr), a knowledgebase reporting computational inference of cellular drug response for hundreds of cell types from various tissues. We took advantage of the high-throughput profiling of drug-induced gene expression available through the Connectivity Map resource (CMap) as well as hundreds of scRNA-seq data covering cells from a wide variety of organs/tissues, diseases, and conditions. Currently, CeDR maintains the results for more than 582 single cell data objects for human, mouse and cell lines, including about 140 phenotypes and 1250 tissue-cell combination types. All the results can be explored and searched by keywords for drugs, cell types, tissues, diseases, and signature genes. Overall, CeDR fine maps drug response at cellular resolution and sheds lights on the design of combinatorial treatments, drug resistance and even drug side effects.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    48FAIR score
    F Findable
    65
    A Accessible
    68
    I Interoperable
    25
    R Reusable
    33
    Top 56% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 44%Citation Network 56%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.538

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.675

    From 25 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences200555,906 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project
      Nature Genetics20139,949 citationsDataRank 18.2Top 8%
    3. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
      Nature Communications20177,641 citationsDataRank 1.3
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 44% comes from its base citations and 56% from the citation network (25 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (8)

    Hongen KangORCID,Tianyi XuORCID,Lili HaoORCID,Yiming Bao,Peilin JiaORCID

    Related Papers (10)