The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2026: making proteomics data FAIR is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.568, placing it in the top 34.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 33 times, with 30 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 35% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier for its own dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The paper names the consortium and its member repositories, but does not name a repository holding data from this study.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper's data availability statement points to the consortium website, not to a repository record for the study's own data.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper describes the consortium's datasets in general, but does not itemise the files or variables of its own dataset.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper does not provide a route to its own dataset; the data availability statement refers to the consortium, not to the study's data.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper labels the consortium's data as freely available, but does not label access conditions for its own dataset.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper discusses controlled access for human proteomics data in general, but does not name a gatekeeper for its own dataset.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state a retention timeline or availability timing for its own dataset.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper mentions formats like mzML for the consortium's data, but does not name a format for its own dataset.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper mentions PSI standards used by the consortium, but does not name a data or metadata standard applied to its own dataset.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper references many external resources, but these are not identifiers for resources that the study's own data depend on.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper mentions CC0 and CC-BY as default licenses for datasets in the consortium, but does not attach a license to its own dataset.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not provide a version token or date for its own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not mention code written for this study; it is a review paper, so no code is available.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Wellcome Trust (223745/Z/21/Z)”
The paper lists multiple award numbers in the funding section, including '223745/Z/21/Z' from the Wellcome Trust.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes methods used by the consortium, but does not name instruments or tools for producing its own dataset.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
The paper does not mention a documentation object accompanying the study's own data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.529
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0386
From 5 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 30 citers.
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 223745/Z/21/Z
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Grant: 2021YFA1301603
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Grant: 2024YFE0202700
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Grant: BB/S01781X/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Grant: BB/T019670/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Grant: BB/V018779/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Grant: BB/X001911/1
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Grant: BB/Y513829/1
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Grant: 15650519
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Grant: 18063028
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Grant: JPMJND2304
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Grant: C19/BM/13684739
University of Washington
Grant: UWPR95794
Open Targets
Grant: OTAR3091
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 GM087221
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R24 GM127667
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R24 GM141156
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R24GM148372
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U24DK133658
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Grant: EP/Y035984/1
Panorama Partners Program
Wellcome Trust
Chinese National Infrastructure for Protein Science
ELIXIR
ELIXIR
Panorama Partners Program
Chinese National Infrastructure for Protein Science
Wellcome Trust
FWCI
14.08
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords