🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline

Nucleic Acids Research(2016)10.1093/nar/gkw569Source: DataRank Database

NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline is a dataset published in Nucleic Acids Research (2016). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 14.6, placing it in the top 13.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 6,925 times, with 194 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 39/100.

Top 13%percentile
14.6DataRank
14.6Top 13%
Dataset Open Access6925 citations · base score 8.8
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Recent technological advances have opened unprecedented opportunities for large-scale sequencing and analysis of populations of pathogenic species in disease outbreaks, as well as for large-scale diversity studies aimed at expanding our knowledge across the whole domain of prokaryotes. To meet the challenge of timely interpretation of structure, function and meaning of this vast genetic information, a comprehensive approach to automatic genome annotation is critically needed. In collaboration with Georgia Tech, NCBI has developed a new approach to genome annotation that combines alignment based methods with methods of predicting protein-coding and RNA genes and other functional elements directly from sequence. A new gene finding tool, GeneMarkS+, uses the combined evidence of protein and RNA placement by homology as an initial map of annotation to generate and modify ab initio gene predictions across the whole genome. Thus, the new NCBI's Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) relies more on sequence similarity when confident comparative data are available, while it relies more on statistical predictions in the absence of external evidence. The pipeline provides a framework for generation and analysis of annotation on the full breadth of prokaryotic taxonomy. For additional information on PGAP see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/ and the NCBI Handbook, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174280/.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    39FAIR score
    F Findable
    53
    A Accessible
    43
    I Interoperable
    38
    R Reusable
    25
    Top 80% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 9%Citation Network 91%

    Base Score Contribution

    1.3

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    13.3

    From 194 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 9% comes from its base citations and 91% from the citation network (194 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (10)

    Michael DiCuccioORCID,Azat Badretdin,Vyacheslav Chetvernin,Eric P. NawrockiORCID,Leonid ZaslavskyORCID

    Related Papers (10)

    Nucleic Acids Research(2004)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1093/nar/gkh340
    Genome Biology(2019)
    co-cited
    10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0
    Exploring gene content with pangene graphs
    N/A
    0.899DataRank · unranked
    Bioinformatics(2024)
    co-cited
    10.1093/bioinformatics/btae456
    Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools
    N/A
    1.4DataRank · unranked
    GigaScience(2021)
    co-cited
    10.1093/gigascience/giab008