A Chinese hamster transcription start site atlas that enables targeted editing of CHO cells is a dataset published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.553, placing it in the top 35.3% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 15 times, with 7 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 29/100.
Ranks in the top 35% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“All sequencing data are submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with GEO ID GSE159044.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a GEO accession, a persistent identifier. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“All sequencing data are submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with GEO ID GSE159044.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) as the repository. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“All sequencing data are submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with GEO ID GSE159044.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset identifier appears in the body text, not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All sequencing data are submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with GEO ID GSE159044. The Supplementary Data provided is also uploaded to Synapse (synapse.org), with ID syn22969187.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data-availability statement points to a repository record with an accession (GSE159044) and a Synapse ID, corresponding to Colavizza category 3. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The Supplementary Data provided is also uploaded to Synapse (synapse.org), with ID syn22969187. This includes our revised protein-coding promoter TSS annotation, in which each of TSS has an associated RefSeq transcript and gene association.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes the dataset content in prose but not in an itemised inventory. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“All sequencing data are submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with GEO ID GSE159044.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper states that all sequencing data are submitted to a public repository (GEO) with no precondition, embargo, or request requirement. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
No explicit access-level label is applied to the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are from animal (hamster) samples, not human subjects, so no gatekeeper is named or required; the paper does not mention any controlled-access procedure.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state any temporal commitment regarding how long the data will be available or a retention period.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not name any file format for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, an ontology) is named as being applied to the data; the paper only mentions analysis pipelines and software.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“doi:10.7303/syn17037372”
The paper includes a DOI (doi:10.7303/syn17037372) referencing a proteogenomics annotation resource used in the study, which is a qualified reference to an external dataset.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper does not state any licence or terms of use for the data; the CC BY-NC licence applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to identify a specific snapshot of the data; the GEO accession is not versioned.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide any code locator (URL, DOI, or repository) for the study's own code; only third-party tools are mentioned.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“K99GM135515”
The paper lists specific grant numbers (e.g., K99GM135515, AI135972, GM134366) attached to named funders, providing award identifiers.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Illumina HiSeq2500”
The paper names specific instruments (e.g., Illumina HiSeq2500) and software versions (e.g., STAR v2.5.3a) used to generate the data.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The annotation provided (Supplementary Data S2 and S3) includes the chromosome, start position (0-based index similar to bed format), strand, position, corresponding gene name, corresponding transcript, comma-separated list of biosamples that express the TSS, and a confidence score”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The definition of the data fields (variables) is provided inside the article (in the Methods section, describing Supplementary Data S2 and S3), not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.416
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.137
From 5 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 7 citers.
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Grant: K99GM135515
National Institutes of Health
Grant: AI135972
National Institutes of Health
Grant: GM134366
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: NNF10CC1016517
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: NNF20SA0066621
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: NNF16OC0021638
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 GM134366
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: R00 GM135515
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Grant: NNF21SA0066621
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DA051972
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01GM134366-04
Uncovering how transcription and chromatin 3D structure impact one another during cellular activation
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1K99GM135515-01
Exploiting Natural Genetic and Organismic Variation to Identify the DNA Motifs Regulating Transcription
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U19AI135972-04
Fluomics: The Next Generation
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
Cancer Research Institute Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship Program
FWCI
1.04
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals