The interplay between insomnia symptoms and Alzheimer’s disease across three main brain networks is a dataset published in SLEEP (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.779, placing it in the top 25.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 24 times, with 19 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 8/100.
Ranks in the top 26% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The paper does not provide a persistent identifier for the study's own derived data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No PID scheme string appears in the text that identifies the study's own dataset; the OSF link is for preregistration, the GitLab link is for code, and the ADNI URL is for source data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The paper states: 'The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multisite initiative for the prevention and treatment of AD. The MRI, CSF biomarker, and clinical data used in the present study is available under the ADNI data sharing policy. Modifications to the data were tracked by DataLad and are reported in a GitLab repository ( https://jugit.fz-juelich.de/j.elberse/adni-insomnia ).'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names ADNI and GitLab, but ADNI is the source data repository, not the holder of the study's own derived data, and GitLab is a code repository, not a data repository. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“The paper does not cite the study's own dataset in the reference list or body text.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No identifier for the study's own derived data appears in the text, so the dataset is not cited anywhere. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The paper states: 'The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multisite initiative for the prevention and treatment of AD. The MRI, CSF biomarker, and clinical data used in the present study is available under the ADNI data sharing policy. Modifications to the data were tracked by DataLad and are reported in a GitLab repository ( https://jugit.fz-juelich.de/j.elberse/adni-insomnia ).'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to the ADNI repository for the source data and a GitLab repository for code/modifications, not to the study's own derived data, so it does not constitute a statement for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The paper states: 'We measured the gray matter volume (GMV), structural covariance (SC), degrees centrality (DC), and functional connectivity (FC), testing the effect and interaction of insomnia symptoms and diagnosis on each index.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes the data content in running prose but does not provide an itemised inventory (section, table, or list) of files or variables. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The paper states: 'The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multisite initiative for the prevention and treatment of AD. The MRI, CSF biomarker, and clinical data used in the present study is available under the ADNI data sharing policy. Modifications to the data were tracked by DataLad and are reported in a GitLab repository ( https://jugit.fz-juelich.de/j.elberse/adni-insomnia ).'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not provide a route to access the study's own derived data; it only describes the source data's availability and a code repository, not the derived data themselves. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The text states: 'The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multisite initiative for the prevention and treatment of AD. The MRI, CSF biomarker, and clinical data used in the present study is available under the ADNI data sharing policy. Modifications to the data were tracked by DataLad and are reported in a GitLab repository ( https://jugit.fz-juelich.de/j.elberse/adni-insomnia ).'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not label the access level of the study's own derived data; it only describes the source data's availability under ADNI policy, which is not a label for the derived data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The paper states: 'The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multisite initiative for the prevention and treatment of AD. The MRI, CSF biomarker, and clinical data used in the present study is available under the ADNI data sharing policy.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name a gatekeeper for the study's own derived data; it only references the ADNI data sharing policy, which governs the source data, not the derived data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“The paper does not state any timeline for the study's own derived data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper contains no sentence about the timing or persistence of the study's own derived data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“The paper does not state the format of the released derived data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No file format token is named for the study's own derived data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“The paper mentions 'BIDS format [42]' and 'Schaefer atlas [46]' but does not apply a community standard to the derived data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name a data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, MINSEQE) applied to the study's own derived data; it only mentions tools and atlases. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“ADNI database ( https://adni.loni.usc.edu )”
The paper provides an identifier for the ADNI resource (URL) and also for the preregistration (OSF) and grant numbers, which are external resources. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“The paper states: 'This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name a licence for the study's own derived data; the CC BY licence is for the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“The paper does not provide a version token or date for the study's own derived data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No version token or date pins the snapshot of the study's own derived data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Modifications to the data were tracked by DataLad and are reported in a GitLab repository ( https://jugit.fz-juelich.de/j.elberse/adni-insomnia ).”
A machine-resolvable code repository URL is given for the study's own code and modifications. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
The paper states it did not receive any funding, so no funder or award number is provided. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The paper states: 'The T1w and rs-fMRI images were preprocessed using the standard fMRIPrep pipeline, with additional motion correction performed by ICA-AROMA for functional data.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific tools (fMRIPrep, ICA-AROMA) used to produce the data, even without version tokens. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The paper does not mention a documentation object (README, codebook) accompanying the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No documentation object is named as travelling with the study's own data, and no variable-definition table exists for the derived data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.483
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.297
From 10 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 19 citers.
Helmholtz Imaging Platform
Grant: ZT-I-PF-4-010
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U01 AG024904
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01AG024904-01
Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
FWCI
8.21
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
The interplay between insomnia symptoms and Alzheimer’s Disease across three main brain networks