🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge

Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

Royal Society Open Science(2024)10.1098/rsos.240125Source: DataRank Database

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies is a research paper published in Royal Society Open Science (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.269. It has been cited 5 times.

N/A

0.269DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access5 citations

Cite:

Linked data & code

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (22 grants)Impact (FWCI 4.18)OA: goldTopics (39)Linked Datasets (3)DataCite Reuse (3)IDs (PubMed, PMC, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

0.269

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (42)

Suzanne Hoogeveen ORCID,Don van den Bergh ORCID,Balazs Aczel ORCID,Casper J. Albers ORCID,Tim Althoff ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:39050728 PMC:PMC11265885 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W4400900739

National Science Foundation

Grant: IIS-1901386

National Science Foundation

Grant: IIS-2142794

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions

Grant: 101023805

Cortical hierarchy of memories - deciphering the neuronal mechanisms of serial dependence in the human brain

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: 016.Vici.181.029

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: 016.Vici.185.068

Financial Techology’s (FinTech’s) Disruptive Impact on Financial Markets: Social Costs and Benefits of an Emerging New Architecture

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: 016.Vidi.188.001

Back to Bayesics: Solving the Reproducibility Crisis in Biomedicine

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: VI.C.221.100

Examining Variation in Causal Effects in Psychology (EVINCE Psychology)

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: VI.Vidi.191.091

Stopping in the real world: A cognitive-psychometric approach to the measurement of response inhibition

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Grant: BU 2400/11-1

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Grant: META-REP: A Meta-scientific Programme to Analyse a

Amsterdam Brain and Cognition

Grant: ABC PG 22

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

Grant: P20GM104420

Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires

Grant: R&D grant

Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires

Grant: R&D grant

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 2P20GM104420-06A1

Center for Modeling Complex Interactions

National Science Foundation

Grant: 1901386

III: Large: Collaborative Research: Analysis Engineering for Robust End-to-End Data Science

National Science Foundation

Grant: 2142794

CAREER: Realizing the Potential of Behavioral Data Science for Population Health

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Grant: unidentified

unidentified

UK Economic and Social Research Council

Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond

Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse

FWCI

4.18

Citation Percentile

0.9%

Citation Trend

2024

2025

goldLicense: cc-by

journalhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article-pdf/doi/10.1098/rsos.240125/951538/rsos.240125.pdf

publisherhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article-pdf/doi/10.1098/rsos.240125/951538/rsos.240125.pdf

publisherhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.240125

publisherhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsos.240125

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240125

Fields of Study

Delphi Technique in Research0301 basic medicine03 medical and health sciences0303 health sciences

Keywords

Outcome (game theory)Computer scienceData scienceMetric (unit)Delphi methodEmpirical evidencePsychologyRange (aeronautics)Applied psychologyEconometricsCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceEpistemologyMathematicsEconomicsOperations managementOpen ScienceTeam ScienceMetascienceScientific TransparencyCrowdsourcing AnalysisScience, Society And PolicyCHOICESScienceNUMBERMeta-scienceSCALEScience & TechnologyVIBRATIONMany AnalystsQMultidisciplinary SciencesCULTURAL CONSENSUS THEORYScience & Technology - Other TopicsPOINTS

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL from Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

10.6084/m9.figshare.26348617.v1The Royal Society

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL from Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

10.6084/m9.figshare.26348617.v2The Royal Society

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL from Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies

10.6084/m9.figshare.26348617The Royal Society