Low‐Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Late Gestation Cervix and Birth Outcome Correlation: A Prospective Cohort Study is a dataset published in BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0, placing it in the top 100% of the data-sharing corpus. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 100% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
No persistent identifier string in any scheme is given for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
No repository is named as the holder of the data; the data are not publicly available.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, either in the reference list or in the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
The Data Availability Statement exists but declares the data cannot be shared, offering no route of any kind; this corresponds to Colavizza category 0 (no route).
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The initial cohort contained 99 pregnant women between 35+5 and 40+1 weeks gestational age (GA). Of these, 8 women had repeat scans 1-3 weeks after their initial MRI, creating 105 datasets.”
The dataset's extent (number of scans) is stated in running prose, but no itemised inventory of files or variables is provided. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
The text states the data are not publicly available, offering no route to access them.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
The text states the data are not publicly available but does not apply any standard access-level label (e.g., 'restricted access') from the COAR vocabulary. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
The data are sensitive human-subject data, but no gatekeeper of any kind is named; the statement merely refuses access.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“The individual fetal MRI datasets used for this study are not publicly available due to ethics regulations.”
No persistence commitment or availability timing is stated for the data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named in the paper.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for an external resource (e.g., another dataset, reference genome build, code DOI) occurs in the text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse licence is attached to the data; the CC BY licence applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to identify a snapshot of the data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided for the study's own code; the code is not made available.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/X010007/1), the NIH Human Placenta Project grant (1U01HD087202-01), the NIHR Clinical Research Facility (CRF) at Guy's and St Thomas' and by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. L.S. is funded by Health Education England/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR Advanced Fellowship 301664). J.H. is funded by DFG Heisenberg funding (502024488) and an ERC StG EARTHWORM (101165242).”
Award/grant numbers are given for multiple funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All women underwent scanning on a 0.55T Free.Max MR scanner at the KCL Advanced Imaging Centre, St Thomas's Hospital.”
The specific instrument (0.55T Free.Max MR scanner) and software (ITK-SNAP, 3D UNet) are named.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table S2: Formalised measurement definitions for the proposed landmark-based cervix biometry protocol.”
Variable definitions are provided in a supplementary table inside the article, but no documentation object is said to accompany the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Grant: 301664
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant: 502024488
Medical Research Council
Grant: MR/X010007/1
European Research Council
Grant: 101165242
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Grant: 1U01HD087202-01
UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
King's College London
University College London
FWCI
0.00
Citation Percentile
0.4%
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords