Completeness and Quality of Data for Children in Medicaid Comprehensive Managed Care Compared to Fee‐for‐Service, 2001–2019 is a dataset published in Health Services Research (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.231, placing it in the top 61.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 3 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 62% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No persistent identifier is given for the study's own dataset; the only identifiers are for the article and for the source data without a specific accession.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The repository named (CMS) is the source of the secondary data, not a repository holding the study's own dataset.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text; only the source data are mentioned.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The DAS points to a request-based route (Colavizza category 1) rather than a repository record. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The sample included 368.7 million person-years across 888 state-years.”
The dataset's size is stated in running prose, but no itemized inventory (section, table, list) is provided. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only route is a request to the authors with permission from CMS, which is a precondition and not a direct open access route.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper states that the data are available from the authors with permission from CMS, but does not label the access level explicitly. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
CMS is an institutional gatekeeper named as the entity that must grant permission for access. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study.”
The paper does not state how long the data will be available; only that restrictions apply.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide 8.3.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name any file format for the released data; only the analysis software is mentioned.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“This study was approved by the Rutgers Institutional Review Board and followed the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Data (RECORD) guidelines.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only standard named is a reporting guideline (RECORD), which is a manuscript standard, not a data or metadata standard. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (K01DA049950), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01‐AR074436), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD109335), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR003017, UM1TR004789) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).”
The paper lists grant numbers, which are identifiers for funding, but no identifier for a resource that the data depend on (like the source data or code).
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.”
The license (CC BY-NC) applies to the article, not to the data. No license is stated for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“We used Release 2 of TAF data for 2014–2018 and Release 1 of TAF 2019, reflecting the most recent releases.”
The version mentioned is for the source data (TAF), not for the study's own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide 8.3.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No code is made available; only the software name is given.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (K01DA049950), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01‐AR074436), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD109335), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR003017, UM1TR004789) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).”
Multiple grant numbers are provided for the funding agencies.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide 8.3.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names the specific software (SAS Enterprise Guide 8.3) used to produce the analysis results. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Data S1. Supporting Information.”
Supporting information is part of the article, not a documentation object traveling with the data outside the article. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.208
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0233
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 2 citers.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Grant: R01‐AR074436
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Grant: R01HD109335
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: K01DA049950
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UL1TR003017
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UM1TR004789
FWCI
4.51
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals