Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome 3‐year symptom trajectories: the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain ( MAPP) Symptom Patterns Study is a dataset published in British Journal of Urology (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.130, placing it in the top 70.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 52/100.
Ranks in the top 71% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“10.58020/2gk3‐hy95”
The paper provides a DOI (10.58020/2gk3‐hy95) for its dataset, which is a persistent-identifier scheme.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK‐CR)”
The NIDDK Central Repository is a proper-noun data repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“Data from The MAPP II Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: The Trans‐MAPP SPS (MAPP II) ([version 1] https://doi.org/10.58020/2gk3‐hy95 ) reported here are available for request at the NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK‐CR) website, Resources for Research (R4R), https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/ .”
The dataset identifier appears only in the body text (data availability statement), not in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data from The MAPP II Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: The Trans‐MAPP SPS (MAPP II) ([version 1] https://doi.org/10.58020/2gk3‐hy95 ) reported here are available for request at the NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK‐CR) website, Resources for Research (R4R), https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/ .”
The statement points to a repository record with a DOI, placing it in Colavizza category 3 (link to archived data in a public repository).
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Patients completed four weekly run‐in assessments, baseline visit, and quarterly visits up to 3 years, providing clinical and patient‐reported data.”
The dataset's content is described in running prose rather than an itemised inventory (section, table, or list). [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data from The MAPP II Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: The Trans‐MAPP SPS (MAPP II) ([version 1] https://doi.org/10.58020/2gk3‐hy95 ) reported here are available for request at the NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK‐CR) website, Resources for Research (R4R), https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/ .”
The phrase 'available for request' indicates a followable process with a precondition (request), not unconditional open access. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data from The MAPP II Study of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: The Trans‐MAPP SPS (MAPP II) ([version 1] https://doi.org/10.58020/2gk3‐hy95 ) reported here are available for request at the NIDDK Central Repository (NIDDK‐CR) website, Resources for Research (R4R), https://repository.niddk.nih.gov/ .”
The text describes an access action (request) but applies no explicit access-level label. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“available for request at the NIDDK Central Repository”
The NIDDK Central Repository is an institutional gatekeeper for these human-subject data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states how long the data will remain available or commits to persistence. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format for the released data is named anywhere in the text.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“STROBE”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only named standard is a manuscript reporting guideline (STROBE), not a data or metadata standard. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for any external resource (e.g., database accession, genome build, software DOI) is given beyond the paper's own dataset DOI.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license for the data is stated; the CC-BY 4.0 license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“[version 1]”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data availability statement includes '[version 1]' in the DOI string, providing a version token. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No locator for the study's own code is given; only third-party software (MATLAB, SAS) is named.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“DK82370, DK82342, DK82315, DK82344, DK82325, DK82345, DK82333, and DK82316”
The paper lists specific grant numbers from the NIDDK/NIH, which are award identifiers.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI) and Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) were used to assess UCPPS pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life (QOL).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific instruments (GUPI, ICSI) and software (MATLAB, SAS) used to produce the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The SPS patient‐reported assessments are listed in Table S1”
Variable definitions live inside the article (Table S1), but no documentation object is said to accompany the deposited data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0256
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 1 citer.
NIH HHS
National Institutes of Health
NIH HHS
NIH HHS
FWCI
0.94
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords