Epidemiological evaluation of the outcomes of initial root canal therapy in permanent teeth of a publicly insured paediatric population is a dataset published in International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.300, placing it in the top 55.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 19/100.
Ranks in the top 55% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier string for the dataset is present in the paper; the article's own DOI is not the data's PID.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The data that support the findings of this study are provided to the Health Evaluation and Analytics Lab at the New York University by the New York State Department of Health.”
The named holder is the New York State Department of Health, which is a non-repository host. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, neither in the body text nor in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are provided to the Health Evaluation and Analytics Lab at the New York University by the New York State Department of Health. The Department of Health restricts the use of the data and authorized its use for this study. Hence, any use of the data requires permission from the New York State Department of Health.”
The statement points to a third party (New York State Department of Health) with restrictions, not to a public repository record, placing it in Colavizza category 1/2 and thus partial.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The following information was collected for each initial NSRCT procedure: patient identification number, tooth number, date of initial NSRCT, patient age, patient gender, race or ethnicity, zip code, date of patient disenrollment in Medicaid, date of final restoration, type of final restoration, type of untoward event (up to the third), and date(s) of the untoward event(s).”
The paper provides an enumerated colon-list of variables collected, which qualifies as an itemised inventory of the dataset. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“any use of the data requires permission from the New York State Department of Health.”
The text specifies a followable access process (permission from a named department) that carries a precondition, so it is not unconditionally open.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“any use of the data requires permission from the New York State Department of Health.”
The text describes the access action (requiring permission) but does not apply an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The Department of Health restricts the use of the data and authorized its use for this study. Hence, any use of the data requires permission from the New York State Department of Health.”
The paper names the New York State Department of Health as the institutional gatekeeper that must grant permission for data access.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper states neither a persistence commitment nor an availability timing for this study's data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format for the released data is named in the paper; the data are not deposited in any format.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“Codes on Dental Procedures (CDTs) were used to identify the endodontic therapy procedures (initial NSRCT) for analysis (D3310, D3320, and D3330).”
The paper names Current Dental Terminology (CDT) codes, a controlled vocabulary that is a data community standard registered in FAIRsharing.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, build ID) is given for any external resource that the study's data depend on or derive from.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license or terms document is named for the data; the article's CC BY-NC-ND license applies only to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date is given that pins the snapshot of the dataset used or released.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code location is provided; the paper mentions using SAS and R but does not offer a machine-resolvable locator for the study's own code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K01DE028591 (PI, Lorel E. Burns).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides an alphanumeric award number (K01DE028591) attached to a named funder. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes the data as administrative claims but does not name any specific instruments, kits, or software used to produce the original data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The following information was collected for each initial NSRCT procedure: patient identification number, tooth number, date of initial NSRCT, patient age, patient gender, race or ethnicity, zip code, date of patient disenrollment in Medicaid, date of final restoration, type of final restoration, type of untoward event (up to the third), and date(s) of the untoward event(s).”
Variable definitions are provided inside the article in running prose, not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0311
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 1 citer.
NIDCR NIH HHS
Grant: K01 DE028591
NIH HHS
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
NIH HHS
FWCI
1.00
Citation Percentile
0.7%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals