Physical activity and cancer: an umbrella review of the literature including 22 major anatomical sites and 770 000 cancer cases is a research paper published in British Journal of Sports Medicine (2017). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.841. It has been cited 272 times.
ObjectiveTo provide an overview of the breadth and validity of claimed associations between physical activity and risk of developing or dying from cancer.DesignUmbrella review.Data sourcesWe searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database and Web of Science.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesSystematic reviews about physical activity and cancer incidence and cancer mortality in different body sites among general population.ResultsWe included 19 reviews covering 22 cancer sites, 26 exposure-outcome pairs meta-analyses and 541 original studies. Physical activity was associated with lower risk of seven cancer sites (colon, breast, endometrial, lung, oesophageal, pancreas and meningioma). Only colon (a protective association with recreational physical activity) and breast cancer (a protective association with overall physical activity) were supported by strong evidence and highly suggestive evidence, respectively. Evidence from endometrial, lung, oesophageal, pancreas and meningioma presented hints of uncertainty and bias in the literature (eg, not reaching P values-6) showing large between-study heterogeneity and/or not demonstrating a definite direction for the effect when 95% prediction intervals were considered. Four of the 26 meta-analyses showed small study effects and 4 showed excess significance.ConclusionPhysical activity is associated with a lower risk of several cancers, but only colon and breast cancer associations were supported by strong or highly suggestive evidence, respectively. Evidence from other cancer sites was less consistent, presenting hints of uncertainty and/or bias.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.841
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.