Associations between WASH-related violence and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls and young women in South Africa (HPTN 068): a cross-sectional analysis is a dataset published in BMJ Open (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.570, placing it in the top 34.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 11 times, with 11 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 17/100.
Ranks in the top 34% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide any persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) for its own dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data access to HPTN 068 is managed by FHI360.”
The paper names FHI360 as the organization that manages data access, but FHI360 is not a curated data repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing; it is a non-repository host. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the study's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text; the trial registration number is for the trial, not the dataset.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“No data are available. Data access to HPTN 068 is managed by FHI360. Data requests for de-identified data can be made by contacting Erica Hamilton at [email protected]”
The data-availability statement points to a third-party request process (contact person), which corresponds to Colavizza category 1 ('data available on request').
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Data for this study are from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 068 cohort of adolescent girls and young women in rural Mpumalanga Province, South Africa, a longitudinal cohort established in 2012 to estimate the effect of cash transfers, conditional on staying in school, on HIV incidence.”
The paper describes the dataset in running prose, stating that data are from the HPTN 068 cohort, but does not provide an itemized inventory of files or variables. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“No data are available.”
The paper offers a discretionary request to a person (Erica Hamilton) with no defined followable process, which is classified as 'no' under the rubric.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“No data are available.”
The paper does not provide an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary; it merely states 'No data are available' and then offers a contact for requests, which is not a standard label. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data requests for de-identified data can be made by contacting Erica Hamilton at [email protected]”
The data access is controlled via a request to a named individual at FHI360, not through an institutional gatekeeper or committee. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“No data are available.”
The paper does not state when the data become available or how long they persist; it only declares data are not available, so no timeline or persistence commitment is made.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format for the released data is mentioned anywhere in the text.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper uses the CES-D scale as a measurement instrument but does not name a data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, Dublin Core, an ontology) for the dataset itself.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Trial registration number NCT01233531”
The paper provides an identifier (NCT01233531) for the HPTN 068 trial, which is a resource other than the paper's own dataset that the data derive from. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license or terms are stated for the data; the CC BY 4.0 license applies only to the article, not to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“Data are from visit 3 of the HPTN 068 cohort”
The paper identifies a specific snapshot of the data by naming 'visit 3', which functions as a version token (a specific data collection wave). [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“All analyses were performed using Stata V.15.”
Only a third-party software is named; no code written by the study authors is provided or located.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01 MH110186)”
The paper includes an alphanumeric grant number (R01 MH110186) attached to a named funder.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analyses were performed using Stata V.15.”
The paper names a specific software version (Stata V.15) used for data analysis, which is a named tool contributing to provenance.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table 1 Demographic characteristics and prevalence of depression, experience with WASH-related violence and fear of WASH-related violence (n=1798)”
Variable definitions are provided in Table 1 within the article, but no separate documentation object is said to accompany the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.373
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.197
From 10 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 11 citers.
Carolina Population Center
Grant: P2C HD050924
National Department of Science and Innovation
Grant: N/A
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01 MH110186
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: UM1 AI068619
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: UM1AI068613
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: UM1AI068617
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: R01MH087118
Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom
Grant: 058893/Z/99/A
Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom
Grant: 069683/Z/02/Z
Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom
Grant: 085477/B/08/Z
Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom
Grant: 085477/Z/08/Z
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: P30 MH062246
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 069683
Investigating and responding to health, population and social transitions in rural Southern Africa.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MH087118-03
Effects of Cash Transfer and Community Mobilization in Young South African Women
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MH110186-03
Multilevel Mechanisms of HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 085477
Health, population and social transitions in rural Southern Africa: Elucidating pathways and testing interventions.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P2CHD050924-14
Carolina Population Center
Wellcome Trust
Grant: 058893
Strengthening and stabilising a demographic and health surveillance in Agincourt: foundation for a health and population research programme in South Africa's rural northeast
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UM1AI068613-16
LC: HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UM1AI068617-20S1
HPTN SDMC: HPTN 096 Getting to Zero among Highest HIV Incidence (HHI) Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) in the American South: Testing an Integrated Strategy
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UM1AI068619-09
LOC: HIV Prevention Trials Network
Wellcome Trust
FWCI
2.93
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals