Global HIV prevention, care and treatment services for children: a cross-sectional survey from the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium is a dataset published in BMJ Open (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.319, placing it in the top 53.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 53% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, accession) is given for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
No repository is named; the data are held by the authors/IeDEA, not a public repository.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text; only the paper's own DOI is present. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
The statement points to a person (the corresponding author/IeDEA) for request, which is Colavizza category 1.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“We created a measure of comprehensiveness of paediatric care services based on the WHO’s nine categories of essential services...”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset content is described in running prose only, without an itemised inventory of files or variables. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
The data are not openly accessible; access requires a discretionary request to a person (IeDEA), which is not a followable route. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
The paper describes an action (request to IeDEA) from which the access level must be inferred, without an explicit label. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“All data requests must be approved by IeDEA.”
An institutional gatekeeper (IeDEA) is named as the approving body for data access.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Data are available on request, following a review process and approval by IeDEA.”
No statement about how long the data will be retained or persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No community standard (e.g., MIAME, ISA-Tab) is named for the data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier is given for any external resource that the data depend on or derive from.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“Re- use permitted under CC BY- NC. No commercial re- use.”
The CC BY-NC license applies to the article, not the data; no license is stated for the data themselves.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to identify a specific snapshot of the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided; software is named but not shared.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“AsiaPacific, U01AI069907; CCASAnet, U01AI069923; Central Africa, U01AI096299; East Africa, U01AI069911; NAACCORD, U01AI069918; Southern Africa, U01AI069924; West Africa, U01AI069919.”
Award/grant numbers are provided for the funding sources.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Study data were collected and managed using a web-based survey on the Research Electronic Data Capture platform (www.project-redcap.org) hosted at the Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health at Vanderbilt University.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The specific platform (REDCap) used to collect the data is named. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, codebook) is said to accompany the data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0773
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 2 citers.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: R24AI124872
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI069907
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI069911
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI069919
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI069923
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI069924
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Grant: U01AI096299
NIAID NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AI050410
NIAMS NIH HHS
Grant: K12 AR084234
NIAID NIH HHS
Grant: U01 AI069918
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U54 AG062334
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01AI069923-04S1
CCASAnet: Caribbean, Central and South America Network
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01AI069911-08
East Africa IeDEA Regional Consortium
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01AI096299-02S1
Central Africa IeDEA
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01AI069924-13
International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS - Southern Africa (IeDEA-SA)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R24AI124872-03
Harmonist: A Scalable Toolkit for Standardizing and Coordinating Data Sharing Across International Research Networks
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01AI069918-05
North American AIDS Cohorts Collaboration on Research and Design
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01AI069919-13
IeDEA West Africa Renewal 3
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01AI069907-13
IeDEA Asia-Pacific Research Collaboration
FWCI
0.67
Citation Percentile
0.6%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals