🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing(1998)10.1137/s1064827596304010Source: DataRank Database

Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit is a research paper published in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing (1998). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.3. It has been cited 6,959 times.

N/A
1.3DataRank · unranked
1.3
6959 citations · base score 8.8
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

The time-frequency and time-scale communities have recently developed a large number of overcomplete waveform dictionaries --- stationary wavelets, wavelet packets, cosine packets, chirplets, and warplets, to name a few. Decomposition into overcomplete systems is not unique, and several methods for decomposition have been proposed, including the method of frames (MOF), Matching pursuit (MP), and, for special dictionaries, the best orthogonal basis (BOB). Basis Pursuit (BP) is a principle for decomposing a signal into an "optimal" superposition of dictionary elements, where optimal means having the smallest l1 norm of coefficients among all such decompositions. We give examples exhibiting several advantages over MOF, MP, and BOB, including better sparsity and superresolution. BP has interesting relations to ideas in areas as diverse as ill-posed problems, in abstract harmonic analysis, total variation denoising, and multiscale edge denoising. BP in highly overcomplete dictionaries leads to large-scale optimization problems. With signals of length 8192 and a wavelet packet dictionary, one gets an equivalent linear program of size 8192 by 212,992. Such problems can be attacked successfully only because of recent advances in linear programming by interior-point methods. We obtain reasonable success with a primal-dual logarithmic barrier method and conjugate-gradient solver.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (0/2)
    Interoperable (0/2)
      Reusable (0/3)

        FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

        DataRank Breakdown

        Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

        Base Score Contribution

        1.3

        From this paper's citation signal

        Citation Network Contribution

        0

        Citation network not refreshed for this result

        This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

        Learn more about DataRank methodology →
        Why this DataRank?

        DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

        Base score B(p)
        log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
        Network N(p)
        Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
        Damping factor d = 0.85
        DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
        Self-citations excluded
        Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

        Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

        Read the full methodology →

        Authors (3)

        David L. DonohoORCID,Michael A. SaundersORCID,Scott Shaobing Chen

        Related Papers (10)

        Neurocomputing(2004)
        co-cited
        10.1016/j.neucom.2003.09.008
        Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena(1992)
        co-cited
        10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f
        IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks(2005)
        co-cited
        10.1109/tnn.2005.849840
        Compressed sensing
        N/A
        1.5DataRank · unranked
        IEEE Transactions on Information Theory(2006)
        co-cited
        10.1109/tit.2006.871582
        Decoding by Linear Programming
        N/A
        1.3DataRank · unranked
        IEEE Transactions on Information Theory(2005)
        co-cited
        10.1109/tit.2005.858979
        Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics(2006)
        co-cited
        10.1002/cpa.20124
        Signal Processing(1994)
        co-cited
        10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9
        Biometrika(1994)
        co-cited
        10.1093/biomet/81.3.425
        Support-Vector Networks
        N/A
        1.6DataRank · unranked
        Machine Learning(1995)
        co-cited
        10.1023/a:1022627411411