Domains for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the CRIC Study is a dataset published in American Journal of Nephrology (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.643, placing it in the top 30.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 13 times, with 10 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 31% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) for its own dataset; the URL given is for the CRIC study data, not the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The paper names the NIDDK repository as the holder of the source data, but no repository is named for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
The paper does not cite the study's own dataset in the reference list or body text; the only identifier is the URL for the source data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper states that data are available in the NIDDK repository, but this refers to the source CRIC data, not the study's own data; no statement addresses the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not include an itemised inventory of the dataset (e.g., a 'Data Records' section, table, or list) describing its own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper's data availability statement points to the NIDDK repository for the CRIC study, not to the study's own data; no route is provided for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not explicitly label the access level of the data; it only provides a URL to the NIDDK repository without specifying 'open access', 'restricted', or similar. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper does not name a gatekeeper for its own data; the data availability statement directs enquiries to the corresponding author, but that is a personal gatekeeper for the source data, not the study's own data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state when the data become available or how long they persist; no retention commitment is made.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not name any file format for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name a data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, MINSEQE, an OBO ontology); it uses instruments but not standards registered in FAIRsharing.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper provides a URL for the CRIC study repository, which is a repository URL for the source data; this qualifies as an identifier for a resource other than the study's own data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper does not state a licence for the data; the CC BY-NC licence applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not provide a version token or date for the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide a locator for the code; it only names the software used.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Funding for the CRIC study was obtained under a cooperative agreement from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK060990, U01DK060984, U01DK061022, U01DK061021, U01DK061028, U01DK060980, U01DK060963, U01DK060902, and U24DK060990).”
Multiple award/grant numbers are explicitly listed, attached to named funders. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper names the software used for analysis: 'LCA and LCR were conducted using Mplus 8.6; other analyses were conducted using Stata 16.1.' This provides provenance for the study's own data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
The paper does not provide a README, data dictionary, or codebook that travels with the data; no documentation object is named. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.396
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.247
From 8 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 10 citers.
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG055781
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK060990
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK061028
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR000003
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: K76 AG059930
NCRR NIH HHS
Grant: M01 RR016500
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK114074
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK119199
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U24 DK060990
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: K01 AG064040
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK060902
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK060984
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK061022
NCRR NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 RR024131
NCRR NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 RR029879
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR000424
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: P20 GM109036
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK061021
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR000433
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR002240
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK060963
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DK060980
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR000439
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 8UL1TR000003-07
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DK061022-05S2
Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UL1RR024131-03S3
Clinical and Translational Science Institute
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1K01AG064040-01A1
Frailty, Post-Transplant Delirium, and Neurocognitive Underpinnings of Alzheimers
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1K76AG059930-01
Deprescribing for Older Dialysis Patients
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DK060990-02S1
Scientific and Data Coordinating Center(SDCC) for the P*
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R01AG055781-04S2
Alzheimer's Supplement to ESRD-specific physiologic age
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 4U01DK061028-16
Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2UL1TR000424-06
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P20GM109036-05
Tulane COBRE for Clinical and Translational Research in Cardiometabolic Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U01DK060963-08
Clinical Center for Prospective Cohort Study of CRI
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DK060984-15
Prospective renal insufficiency cohort evaluation: PRICE
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UL1TR000433-08S1
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2UL1TR000439-06
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2M01RR016500-06
ATN 004: HEALTHY CHOICES: MOTIVATIONAL ENHANCEMENT TO PROMOTE HEALTH AND REDU
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U01DK060902-18
Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study IV (CRIC-4)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01DK119199-03
American Indian Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study (AI-CRIC)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R01DK114074-04S1
Alzheimer's Supplement to Hemodialysis-based interventions to preserve cognitive function
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U01DK060980-18
Continuation of the UIC Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Clinical Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DK061021-14
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohor
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UL1RR029879-03S1
Center for Clinical and Translational Science
FWCI
1.48
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Supplementary Material for: Domains for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the CRIC Study
Supplementary Material for: Domains for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the CRIC Study