Ten‐Year Review of Antihypertensive Prescribing Practices After Stroke and the Associated Disparities From the Florida Stroke Registry is a dataset published in Journal of the American Heart Association (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.278, placing it in the top 57% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 3 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 23/100.
Ranks in the top 57% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide any persistent identifier string for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data Availability As FSR uses data from American Heart Association's GWTG‐S, data‐sharing agreements require an application process for other researchers to access data.”
The Florida Stroke Registry is named as the holder, but it is not a curated public repository in the class-1 list; it is a consortium registry. [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears in the paper, either in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data Availability As FSR uses data from American Heart Association's GWTG‐S, data‐sharing agreements require an application process for other researchers to access data. Researchers can submit proposals at www.heart.org/qualityresearch to be considered by the GWTG‐S steering committees. Analytic requests of the data are subject to approval by the FSR publication committee, and aggregate, blinded data may be shared by the corresponding author upon written request from any qualified investigator.”
The data-availability statement points to a request-based process (category 1) rather than a public repository record.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“A total of 372 254 cases from January 2010 to March 2020 are in the FSR with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or subarachnoid hemorrhage; 265 409 with complete data were included in the final analysis.”
The dataset's extent is described in running prose only, without an itemised inventory or section.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“researchers can submit proposals at www.heart.org/qualityresearch to be considered by the GWTG‐S steering committees”
The text gives a specified, followable access process that carries a precondition (application and approval), not unconditional availability.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data Availability As FSR uses data from American Heart Association's GWTG‐S, data‐sharing agreements require an application process for other researchers to access data. Researchers can submit proposals at www.heart.org/qualityresearch to be considered by the GWTG‐S steering committees. Analytic requests of the data are subject to approval by the FSR publication committee, and aggregate, blinded data may be shared by the corresponding author upon written request from any qualified investigator.”
The paper describes a followable access process with a precondition but does not label the access level with a standard vocabulary term.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“researchers can submit proposals at www.heart.org/qualityresearch to be considered by the GWTG‐S steering committees”
The paper names the GWTG‐S steering committees and the FSR publication committee as institutional gatekeepers for accessing the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state any temporal commitment regarding how long the data will be retained or a persistence guarantee.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format token is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“This study is consistent with the Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Data Statement, which is extended from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting checklist (Table S1).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only standard named is a manuscript reporting guideline (STROBE), not a data or metadata community standard. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, etc.) for any external resource other than the paper's own dataset is provided.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license or terms document is named for the data; the CC BY-NC-ND license applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“A total of 372 254 cases from January 2010 to March 2020 are in the FSR”
A date range pins the snapshot of the data, but no version token is provided. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability locator is given; only commercial software (SAS) is mentioned.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders through the Stroke Prevention and Intervention Research Program cooperative grant (Grant Number: U54NS081763) and the Florida Department of Health. This study is funded by the state of Florida Department of Health; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities: R01MD012467.”
The paper includes specific grant numbers attached to named funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Each FSR hospital has specialized abstractors who submit data on all stroke cases to the GWTG‐S form.”
The data collection process is described in generic terms without naming specific instruments, kits, or versioned software. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table 1 Study Population Demographics With Characteristics: BP‐Guideline Nonadherent vs BP‐Guideline Adherent Cohorts”
Variable definitions are provided in tables inside the article, not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
8.77 × 10⁻³
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 3 citers.
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR002736
NIMHD NIH HHS
Grant: R01 MD012467
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: U54 NS081763
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UL1TR002736-05
Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U54NS081763-03S1
Hispanic Stroke Prevention Intervention Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MD012467-03
Disparities in Transition of Care after Acute Stroke Hospitalization: The Transition of Care Stroke Disparity Study (TCSD-S)
FWCI
0.88
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals