Does citation context information enhance the validity of citation analysis for measuring research quality? An empirical comparison of peer assessments and enriched citations is a research paper published in Quantitative Science Studies (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
Scored on demand from live citation data
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Grant: 16WIK2101A
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Grant: 01PH20006B
FWCI
0.70
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords