🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge

Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers

Quantitative Science Studies(2020)10.1162/qss_a_00068Source: DataRank Database

Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers is a research paper published in Quantitative Science Studies (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 90 times.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access90 citations

Cite:

Linked data & code

Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers · arXiv

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Impact (FWCI 3.88)OA: goldTopics (9)Linked Datasets (1)DataCite Reuse (1)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (4)

Sitaram Devarakonda ORCID,Alexander Tekles ORCID,George Chacko ORCID,Lutz Bornmann ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:19162232 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2990160624

FWCI

3.88

Citation Percentile

0.9%

Citation Trend

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

goldLicense: cc-by

journalhttps://direct.mit.edu/qss/article-pdf/1/3/1242/1869859/qss_a_00068.pdf

publisherhttps://direct.mit.edu/qss/article-pdf/1/3/1242/1869859/qss_a_00068.pdf

publisherhttps://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/qss_a_00068

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00068

repositoryhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08775

Fields of Study

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

Keywords

Measure (data warehouse)Field (mathematics)Convergent validityIndex (typography)Convergent evolutionCorrelation

Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers

10.48550/arxiv.1911.08775arXiv