Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Meddling in the 2016 Elections and Satisfaction With Democracy in the US

Political Studies(2022)10.1177/00323217221126300Source: DataRank Database

Meddling in the 2016 Elections and Satisfaction With Democracy in the US is a research paper published in Political Studies (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.410. It has been cited 7 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

0.410DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access7 citations · 6 citing works in its network

Download PDF

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (2 grants)Impact (FWCI 5.36)OA: hybridTopics (23)IDs (PubMed, PMC, OpenAlex)SDGs (1)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 76%Citation Network 24%

Base Score Contribution

0.312

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.0978

From 3 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 5 citers driving the network score

Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(C_q) divided by its reference count — out of 6 citers.

Introducing PEIG 2.0: Sixty-nine years of partisan electoral interventions 1946–2014
Conflict Management and Peace Science202420 citations48 referencesContributes 0.063
Effects of Misinformation on Election Beliefs: Disentangling Motivated Reasoning from Selective Exposure
202211 citations57 referencesContributes 0.044
To What End? Policy Objectives and US Public Support for Political Warfare
Foreign Policy Analysis20251 citations86 referencesContributes 0.008
Political Recruitment and Party Institutionalization: PDIP's Internal Tension in the 2020 Surakarta Mayoral Election
Journal of Local Government Issues20230 citations24 referencesContributes 0.000
Foreign Meddling
Oxford University Press eBooks20250 citations32 referencesContributes 0.000

Authors (3)

Bert Baumgaertner ORCID,Madeleine Curtright,Florian Justwan ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:38716045 PMC:PMC11070316 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W4306292146

national institutes of health

Grant: P20GM104420

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 2P20GM104420-06A1

Center for Modeling Complex Interactions

FWCI

5.36

Citation Percentile

1.0%

Citation Trend

2022

2023

2024

2025

hybridLicense: cc-by-nc

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221126300

publisherhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221126300

publisherhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00323217221126300

publisherhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/00323217221126300

repositoryhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38716045

Fields of Study

Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial Media and PoliticsSocial and Intergroup Psychology05 social sciences0506 political science

Keywords

LoyaltyDemocracyIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionPolitical scienceOutcome (game theory)Value (mathematics)Social psychologyPsychologyPoliticsEconomicsLawMicroeconomicsMotivated ReasoningMoral Foundations TheorySatisfaction With DemocracyElectoral InterventionsArticles

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 0: Peace, Justice and strong institutions