Defining Sickle Cell Disease Mortality Using a Population-Based Surveillance System, 2004 through 2008 is a dataset published in Public Health Reports® (2016). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 4.0, placing it in the top 30.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 90 times, with 76 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 37/100.
Objective. Population-based surveillance data from California and Georgia for years 2004 through 2008 were linked to state death record files to determine the all-cause death rate among 12,143 patients identified with sickle cell disease (SCD). Methods. All-cause death rates, by age, among these SCD patients were compared with all-cause death rates among both African Americans and the total population in the two states. All-cause death rates were also compared with death rates for SCD derived from publicly available death records: the compressed mortality files and multiple cause of death files. Results. Of 12,143 patients identified with SCD, 615 patients died. The all-cause mortality rate for the SCD population was lower than the all-cause mortality rate among African Americans and similar to the total population all-cause mortality rates from birth through age 4 years, but the rate was higher among those with SCD than both the African American and total population rates from ages 5 through 74 years. The count of deceased patients identified by using population-based surveillance data ( n=5615) was more than twice as high as the count identified in compressed mortality files using SCD as the underlying cause of death alone ( n=5297). Conclusion. Accurate assessment of all-cause mortality and age at death requires long-term surveillance via population-based registries of patients with accurately diagnosed SCD.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.677
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
3.3
From 60 citing papers with measurable signal
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 17% comes from its base citations and 83% from the citation network (60 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.