Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies is a research paper published in Qualitative Health Research (2016). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4. It has been cited 10,470 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
1.4
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →FWCI
596.07
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Additional file 1 of The experience of participating in an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program among patients with cardiovascular disease and depression: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 1 of The experience of participating in an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program among patients with cardiovascular disease and depression: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 1 of What matters when asking, “what matters to you?” — perceptions and experiences of health care providers on involving older people in transitional care
Additional file 1 of What matters when asking, “what matters to you?” — perceptions and experiences of health care providers on involving older people in transitional care
Additional file 1 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 1 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 2 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 2 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 3 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 3 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 4 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 4 of Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Additional file 1 of Exploring physiotherapists’ clinical definition and diagnosis of inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast in Australia: a mixed methods study
Additional file 1 of Exploring physiotherapists’ clinical definition and diagnosis of inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast in Australia: a mixed methods study
Additional file 2 of Exploring physiotherapists’ clinical definition and diagnosis of inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast in Australia: a mixed methods study
Additional file 2 of Exploring physiotherapists’ clinical definition and diagnosis of inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast in Australia: a mixed methods study
Additional file 1 of Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation
Additional file 1 of Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation
Additional file 2 of Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation
Additional file 2 of Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation