Steroid treatment based on the findings of transbronchial biopsy in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia is a research paper published in European Respiratory Journal (2002). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.5. It has been cited 18 times, with 18 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
This study was performed to find the rationale for administering steroids to patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which was unlikely to be usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) but was not surgically biopsied.Among IIP patients in the file of the departments, nine patients who met the following criteria were selected for this study (“non-UIP” group): 1) transbronchial lung biopsy showed dense mononuclear cell infiltration in thickened alveolar septa; 2) chest radiograph and computed tomography showed irregular linear, reticular or ground-glass opacities with alveolar consolidation without honeycombing in the lung base; and 3) spirometry was performed before and after steroid therapy. Ten patients with pathologically confirmed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (“NSIP” group) were also selected for the comparison. Baseline values and percentage increase of vital capacity (VC) after steroid therapy were plotted.Steroids improved VC in both groups of patients. After 1 yr of steroid therapy, percentage increase of VC in “non-UIP” was 28.8±7.7%, which was not significantly different from that in NSIP (30.0±11.7%). One “non-UIP” patient and one NSIP patient died after 6.4 and 4.3 yrs of follow-up, respectively.Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia presenting cellular interstitial pneumonia in transbronchial lung biopsy, in addition to radiographic findings not typical for usual interstitial pneumonia, could expect a beneficial effect of steroids without undergoing surgical biopsy.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.442
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
1.0
From 12 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 30% comes from its base citations and 70% from the citation network (12 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.