Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is a research paper published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.373. It has been cited 10 times, with 8 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.360
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0137
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 8 citers.
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Additional file 1 of Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Additional file 1 of Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials