The Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative (EDGI): study protocol is a dataset published in BMC Psychiatry (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.2, placing it in the top 17.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 74 times, with 35 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 44/100.
Ranks in the top 17% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The datasets generated and/or analyzed from the US, AU, and NZ will be available in the National Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/).”
The paper provides a URL (https://nda.nih.gov/) for the repository, but no persistent identifier such as a DOI or accession number for the specific dataset. The URL is not a PID scheme.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The datasets generated and/or analyzed from the US, AU, and NZ will be available in the National Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/).”
The paper names the National Data Archive (NDA) and the NIMH Repository and Genomics Resource as repositories for the data.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, either in the body or in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The datasets generated and/or analyzed from the US, AU, and NZ will be available in the National Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov/).”
The statement names a repository and gives a persistent link to the archive, matching Colavizza category 3. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper describes the study design and aims but does not include an itemized inventory (section, table, or list) of the dataset files or variables. No sentence states what the dataset contains or its size. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Genomic data access is made possible by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Data Access Committee.”
The paper states that access to genomic data requires a committee, which is a defined precondition. Danish data are restricted by law, another precondition. The data are not unconditionally available.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Genomic data access is made possible by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Data Access Committee.”
The paper describes the access process (application to a committee) but does not label the access level with a standard term like 'open access' or 'restricted access'. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Genomic data access is made possible by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Data Access Committee.”
The paper names an institutional gatekeeper (the Data Access Committee) for the genomic data, which is a controlled-access repository route.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state when the data will be available or how long they will be retained; it only mentions future availability in repositories without a timeline.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data. The paper mentions genotyping and GWAS but does not specify formats like FASTQ, VCF, or CSV.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, an ontology) is named for the data. The paper uses DSM-5 and ICD-10 as diagnostic standards, but these are not data/metadata standards.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for any external resource that the data depend on (e.g., reference genome build, database accession). The trial registration NCT04378101 is for the study itself, not for a resource. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper applies the CC0 waiver to the data, which is an open standard license. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the data. The paper is a protocol; the data are not yet released.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Our liberal data and analysis sharing principles will make phenotypic and genotype data and scripts widely available for access by other scientists to maximize utility of our investigation.”
The paper mentions scripts will be made available but does not provide a specific locator (URL, DOI, repository). The only URL given is for step-by-step procedures, not for a code repository.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH120170 [Bulik (PI); Martin (PI AU subcontract); Kennedy (PI NZ subcontract); Petersen (PI DK subcontract)]; U01 MH109528, (Sullivan PI, Bulik Co-I).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper lists specific grant numbers (R01MH120170, U01MH109528) attached to named funders. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Saliva samples are collected with Isohelix saliva collection kits and returned to labs at UNC (US), QIMR Berghofer (AU), or University of Otago (NZ).”
The paper names a specific collection kit (Isohelix) and the labs, which are proper-noun tools/instruments used to produce the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, data dictionary, codebook) is named as accompanying the data. The paper mentions only a link to procedures. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.648
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.528
From 20 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 35 citers.
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: MH120170
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: R01 MH120170
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R248-2017-2003
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR002489
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R276-2017-4581
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR001111
Karolinska Institute
FWCI
7.53
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Additional file 1 of ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN): study protocol
Additional file 1 of ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN): study protocol
Additional file 1 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol
Additional file 1 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol
Additional file 1 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol
Additional file 2 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol
Additional file 2 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol
Additional file 2 of Characterising illness stages and recovery trajectories of eating disorders in young people via remote measurement technology (STORY): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol