Computational identification of disease models through cross-species phenotype comparison is a dataset published in Disease Models & Mechanisms (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.509, placing it in the top 37.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 9 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 21/100.
Ranks in the top 38% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The complete list of pairwise mouse model–disease scores and matching terms is available to explore and download from https://diseasemodels.research.its.qmul.ac.uk/.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The identifier is a web URL, not a persistent identifier scheme. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The complete list of pairwise mouse model–disease scores and matching terms is available to explore and download from https://diseasemodels.research.its.qmul.ac.uk/.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are hosted on a university website, not a curated repository. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“The complete list of pairwise mouse model–disease scores and matching terms is available to explore and download from https://diseasemodels.research.its.qmul.ac.uk/.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset identifier (URL) appears only in body text, not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data can be found within the article and its supplementary information.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data availability statement points to the article itself, not to a repository record. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The complete list of pairwise mouse model–disease scores and matching terms is available to explore and download from https://diseasemodels.research.its.qmul.ac.uk/.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset's content is described only in running prose, not in an itemised inventory. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The complete list of pairwise mouse model–disease scores and matching terms is available to explore and download from https://diseasemodels.research.its.qmul.ac.uk/.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are stated to be available at a website with no precondition. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data can be found within the article and its supplementary information.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data availability statement does not use any access-level label such as 'open access' or 'freely available'; it merely states where the data are located.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data are not sensitive human-subject data; no gatekeeper is named.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are mouse phenotype scores and are not sensitive; no gatekeeper is mentioned.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“No statement about data persistence or retention is found in the text.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not mention how long the data will be retained. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“No file format is mentioned for the released data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not specify a file format for the data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“The use of controlled vocabularies that capture the phenotypic abnormalities observed in the mutant mice (Mammalian Phenotype Ontology, MP) and the clinical manifestations observed in patients affected by a particular disease (Human Phenotype Ontology, HPO)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper explicitly names HPO and MP, which are community data standards registered in FAIRsharing. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“IMPC mouse model and phenotype associations, and information on procedures completed according to DR20.1 are available online ( https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/impc/all-data-releases/release-20.1/results/ ; data accessed on 4 April 2023).”
The paper provides a repository URL for the IMPC data, which is a resource other than the paper's own dataset. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“No licence is mentioned for the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not attach any licence to the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“No version token or date is given for the paper's own dataset.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper's dataset is not versioned.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“The code is available at https://github.com/whri-phenogenomics/disease_models”
A GitHub URL is provided for the study's own code. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant UM1-HG006370”
A specific grant number (UM1-HG006370) is given with the funder name. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The PhenoDigm algorithm was used to compute the phenotypic similarity between mouse models and known human disorders.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names a specific algorithm (PhenoDigm) used to produce the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“No documentation object such as a README or data dictionary is named for the dataset.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not mention any accompanying documentation file.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.345
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.163
From 5 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 6 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: UM1-HG006370
NHGRI NIH HHS
Grant: UM1 HG006370
EMBL-EBI
Grant: Core Funds
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UM1HG006370-10
Mouse Phenotyping Informatics Infrastructure - MP12
Wellcome Trust
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
European Bioinformatics Institute
FWCI
1.48
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords