🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Microtubule organization in the final stages of cytokinesis as revealed by cryo-electron tomography

Journal of Cell Science(2011)10.1242/jcs.073486Source: DataRank Database

Microtubule organization in the final stages of cytokinesis as revealed by cryo-electron tomography is a research paper published in Journal of Cell Science (2011). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 2.0. It has been cited 41 times, with 35 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 49/100.

N/A
2.0DataRank · unranked
2.0
41 citations · base score 3.7
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

The completion of cytokinesis is dominated by the midbody, a tightly-packed microtubule (MT)-based bridge that transiently connects the two daughter cells. Assembled from condensed, spindle-MTs and numerous associated proteins, the midbody gradually narrows down until daughter cell partitioning occurs at this site. Although described many years ago, detailed understanding of the abscission process remains lacking. Applying cryo-electron tomography to purified midbodies, in combination with fluorescence microscopy, we present here new insight into MT organization within the midbody. We find that the midbody is spatially divided into a core bundle of MTs that traverses the electron-dense overlap region (continuous MTs), surrounded by MTs that terminate within the overlap region (polar MTs). Residual continuous MTs remained intact up to the verge of abscission, whereas the residual polar MTs lost their organization and retreated from the overlap region at late cytokinesis stages. A detailed localization of the microtubule-bundling protein PRC1 supports the above notion. Our study thus provides a detailed account of the abscission process and suggests that the midbody, having acquired a distinct MT architecture as compared to the preceding central spindle, actively facilitates the final stage of cytokinesis.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (0/2)
    Interoperable (0/2)
      Reusable (0/3)

        FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

        49FAIR score
        F Findable
        100
        A Accessible
        70
        I Interoperable
        0
        R Reusable
        25
        Top 55% by FAIRdeterministic⚠ abstract only
        Estimated from the abstract only. The agent couldn't read this paper's full text, so body-dependent criteria (data-availability statement, formats, license) are inferred. For a confident score, upload the PDF or supply full text →

        Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

        DataRank Breakdown

        Base Score 28%Citation Network 72%

        Base Score Contribution

        0.561

        From this paper's citation signal

        Citation Network Contribution

        1.5

        From 34 citing papers with measurable signal

        Learn more about DataRank methodology →

        Top 4 citers driving the network score

        Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

        1. Assembly and breakdown of microtubules within the midbody
          Communicative & Integrative Biology20112 citationsDataRank 0.231
        Why this DataRank?

        DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 28% comes from its base citations and 72% from the citation network (34 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

        Base score B(p)
        log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
        Network N(p)
        Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
        Damping factor d = 0.85
        DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
        Self-citations excluded
        Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

        Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

        Read the full methodology →

        Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

        Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

        Authors (4)

        Shahar Abramovitch,Helena Sabanay,Ohad Medalia,Nadav Elad