Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices is a research paper published in PLOS Biology (2015). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.929. It has been cited 490 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.929
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →FWCI
21.29
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Influential Citations
14
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Additional file 1 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 1 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 2 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 2 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 3 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 3 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 4 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 4 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 5 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 5 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 6 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 6 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 7 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 7 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 8 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 8 of Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects
Additional file 1 of Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
Additional file 1 of Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
Additional file 1 of Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research
Additional file 1 of Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research