An update to Hippocampome.org by integrating single-cell phenotypes with circuit function in vivo is a dataset published in PLoS Biology (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.0, placing it in the top 19.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 45 times, with 26 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 20% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only identifier given for the dataset is a URL (http://www.hippocampome.org), which is not a persistent identifier scheme. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The named holder for the data is Hippocampome.org, a project website, not a standard repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset identifier (URL) appears only in the body text and not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data-availability statement points to the article itself and supplementary files, not to a repository record (Colavizza category 2). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“S2 Table. Compilation of in vivo data mined from literature.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a supplementary table that itemizes the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper states that the data are available within the paper or at a public website, with no stated precondition (no embargo, registration, or request needed). [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files or are found at http://www.hippocampome.org.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes where to find the data (in the article, supplementary files, or a website) but does not apply an explicit access-level label such as 'open access' or 'publicly available' to the data; the action is described but not labeled. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are animal electrophysiology recordings, not human or sensitive data; no gatekeeper is named because no controlled access is needed.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not mention any retention period, permanent archival, or availability timing for the data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“S1 Data Excel spreadsheet containing, in separate sheets, the underlying numerical data for Figure panels 2 A–E, 3C, 3D, 3F, 3G, 3 I–K, 4 B–F, 5A, 6E, S2E–S2H, S3D, S3G–S3I, S4C, and S4D.”
The only named format for the released data is XLSX (Excel), which is a proprietary format. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name any community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, an ontology) that applies to the data; it uses Hippocampome.org's own classification.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“CA1 (i)0302 C-Bistratified cell (soma and dendrites in blue; axon in red) from NeuroMorpho.Org [NMO_61413]”
The paper gives an identifier (NMO_61413) for a neuron morphology from NeuroMorpho.Org, a resource other than the study's own dataset.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The only license mentioned (CC BY) applies to the article, not explicitly to the data; no separate data license is stated.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not provide a version token or date for the study's own data; it only mentions a version of Hippocampome.org (v1.8) which is a different resource. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide any locator for the study's own code; only third-party tools are mentioned.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
The paper contains no explicit funding statement or grant number in the provided text.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Intracellular signals were acquired with a dedicated amplifier (Axoclamp 900A, 100× gain).”
The paper names specific instruments and software used to produce the data (e.g., Axoclamp 900A, NeuroNexus probes).
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table 1. In vivo membrane properties for hippocampal cell types (sharp intracellular recordings; values are means ± standard deviations).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided in tables inside the article. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.574
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.445
From 19 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 26 citers.
Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Grant: RTI2018-098581-B-I00
European Molecular Biology Organization
Grant: EMBO ALTF 1161-2017
Human Frontiers Science Program
Grant: LT0000717/2018
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01NS39600
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS039600
Academy of Finland
Grant: 275954
Hippocampal oscillations and associative learning: Stepping out of the maze and exploring new waves
Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Grant: FJCI-2017-32719
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: U01 MH114829
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01NS039600-23
Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and Connectivity
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01MH114829-01
Anatomical characterization of neuronal cell types of the mouse brain
FWCI
4.00
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals