Experiment level curation of transcriptional regulatory interactions in neurodevelopment is a dataset published in PLoS Computational Biology (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.431, placing it in the top 43.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 8 times, with 3 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 71/100.
Ranks in the top 43% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/XLLWRL”
The paper provides a DOI for its own dataset, which is a persistent identifier, in the Data Availability Statement.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Scholars Portal Dataverse”
The paper names Scholars Portal Dataverse as the repository holding the data; this is a repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“An additional copy of the data has been deposited in Scholars Portal Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/XLLWRL )”
The dataset identifier (DOI) appears only in the body text (Data Availability Statement) and not as a reference-list entry.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The code for all data analyses and figures generation are available on GitHub ( https://github.com/PavlidisLab/dtri-curation ). An additional copy of the data has been deposited in Scholars Portal Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/XLLWRL )”
The data-availability statement points to a repository record (Scholars Portal Dataverse with a DOI), which is Colavizza category 3.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“we established a collection of 1,499 unique DTRIs, involving 251 TFs and 825 targets”
The dataset's content is described in running prose only, without an itemised inventory (section, table, or enumerated list) of files, variables, or samples. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The code for all data analyses and figures generation are available on GitHub ( https://github.com/PavlidisLab/dtri-curation ). An additional copy of the data has been deposited in Scholars Portal Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/XLLWRL )”
The text gives a route to the data with no stated precondition; the data are stated to be available in the manuscript and in a public repository without any embargo, registration, or application requirement.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“An additional copy of the data has been deposited in Scholars Portal Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/XLLWRL )”
The paper states that the data are deposited in a public repository and available within the manuscript, but does not explicitly label the access level using a standard vocabulary term. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are not sensitive or human-subject; no gatekeeper is mentioned and the criterion is not applicable.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files”
The paper states that the data are available now (within the manuscript and supporting information), but does not specify how long they will persist; no retention period or permanent archival claim is made. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“TSV”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are provided in TSV (tab-separated values) format, which is an open, community-standard format. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“PSI-MI vocabulary”
The paper uses the PSI-MI vocabulary (a community standard for molecular interactions) to annotate the curated records, and also uses standard ontologies such as UBERON. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No external resource identifier (accession, DOI, RRID, etc.) for data or code other than the paper's own dataset appears in the text; only bare names or citations are given. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence is named for the data itself; the CC BY licence applies only to the article, not to the dataset.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is provided for the released dataset; the paper does not identify which snapshot of the data is used or released. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“https://github.com/PavlidisLab/dtri-curation”
The paper provides a machine-resolvable locator (GitHub URL) for the study's own code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“MH111099”
The paper provides specific award/grant numbers for the funding sources. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“We developed a curation protocol to inspect the published literature for support of DTRIs at the experiment level”
The data production (curation) is described in generic terms without naming specific instruments, kits, or software versions used for data generation. [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Box 1. Experimental details recorded during curation”
The definitions of the recorded attributes (fields and variables) are provided inside the article in Box 1, not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.330
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.102
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 3 citers.
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: MH111099
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Grant: RGPIN-2016-05991
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: R01 MH111099
FWCI
0.37
Citation Percentile
0.6%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals