Mapping the gene network landscape of Alzheimer’s disease through integrating genomics and transcriptomics is a dataset published in PLoS Computational Biology (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.705, placing it in the top 28.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 16 times, with 16 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 67/100.
Ranks in the top 28% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“10.5281/zenodo.5786722”
The paper provides a DOI for its own dataset via Zenodo.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
Zenodo is a named data repository.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
The dataset identifier appears only in the body text (data availability statement), not in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
The statement points to a repository record (Zenodo with a DOI), which is Colavizza category 3.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
The dataset's content is described only in a generic sentence, not in an itemised inventory. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
The data are stated to be on Zenodo with no precondition for access.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ).”
The paper describes where to obtain the data but does not label the access level with a standard term.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data are not sensitive; no gatekeeper is named.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The study uses publicly available GWAS and transcriptomic data; no sensitive data are involved, and no gatekeeper is mentioned.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data are available or how long they persist. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file-format token is named for the released data; the supporting information files are .docx and .xlsx, but the paper does not state the format of the Zenodo deposit. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named for the released dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier (DOI, accession, RRID) for any external resource it uses (e.g., the GWAS summary statistics, the STRING database, the Mayo Clinic RNAseq data). [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license is stated for the data; the CC-BY license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date is given for the data snapshot; the Zenodo DOI is a record identifier but the paper does not mention a version. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“We refer the reader to our jupyter notebooks ( https://zenodo.org/record/5786722#.Ybtti73MKC8 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5786722 ))”
A machine-resolvable locator (Zenodo DOI) is given for the code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“CHC was supported by funding under R01MH118281, R56AG061163 from National Institutes of Health.”
Award numbers are provided for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“In our analysis we used interactions classified as ‘high confidence’ (combined score > 0.7), for the human interaction version 10.5, containing 15,131 proteins and 359,776 interactions.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific tools and versions (STRING v10.5, network propagation, jupyter notebooks) used to produce the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“S1 Data Supplementary Tables: Table A: Annotation of genes in the AD disease module. Table B: Functional annotation of the genes in the AD disease module. Table C: Genes in the hierarchical network. Table D: GWAS-identified significant genes that are not in the STRING interactome. (XLSX)”
Variable definitions are provided in supplementary tables inside the article, not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.425
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.280
From 15 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 16 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01MH118281
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R56AG061163
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: R35 GM131881
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MH118281-04
Genetic architecture of the human brain and neuropsychiatric disorders
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R56AG061163-01
Omic analyses for stratifying Alzheimer's subtypes and identifying novel drug targets
FWCI
1.76
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals