Why Most Published Research Findings Are False is a research paper published in PLoS Medicine (2005). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4. It has been cited 10,409 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
1.4
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →The Substrate Floor: Nested Noise Floors for Auditable Abstention Across Heterogeneous Instruments
The Substrate Floor: Nested Noise Floors for Auditable Abstention Across Heterogeneous Instruments
Constraint Generative Theory: Typed Constraint Effects and Scientific Availability
Constraint Generative Theory: Typed Constraint Effects and Scientific Availability
A Typed, Dynamic, No-Meta Theory of Autonomous Research Claim Certification and Release
A Typed, Dynamic, No-Meta Theory of Autonomous Research Claim Certification and Release
Additional file 1 of Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
Additional file 1 of Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
Additional file 1 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 1 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 2 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 2 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 3 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 3 of Hidden analyses: a review of reporting practice and recommendations for more transparent reporting of initial data analyses
Additional file 1 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
Additional file 1 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
Additional file 2 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
Additional file 2 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
Additional file 3 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
Additional file 3 of Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP