Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis

PLOS ONE(2019)10.1371/journal.pone.0215052Source: DataRank Database

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis is a research paper published in PLOS ONE (2019). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.878. It has been cited 347 times.

N/A

0.878DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

347 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

doi

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (4 grants)OA: goldTopics (39)Linked Datasets (25)DataCite Reuse (25)IDs (PubMed, PMC)Annotations (1)SDGs (1)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

0.878

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (3)

Jelte M. Wicherts ORCID,Marcel A. L. M. van Assen ORCID,Robbie C. M. van Aert ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:30978228 PMC:PMC6461282

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant: 406-13-050

Meta-analysis in the presence of publication bias and researcher degrees of freedom

The European Research Council

Grant: 726361 (IMPROVE)

European Research Council

Grant: 726361

Innovative Methods for Psychology: Reproducible, Open, Valid, and Efficient

Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation

goldLicense: cc-by

publisherhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215052&type=printable

publisherhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215052

repositoryhttps://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/47c004f5-a5d6-485c-a2a2-d1fd233159ad

repositoryhttps://doaj.org/article/4eba195434c44adcbc75cfe0b6b05367

repositoryhttps://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Publication_bias_examined_in_meta-analyses_from_psychology_and_medicine_A_meta-meta-analysis/7990286

Fields of Study

01 natural sciences03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicine0101 mathematics

MeSH Terms

HumansData Interpretation, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodPsychologyMedicineSelection BiasQuality ControlDatabases, FactualPublication BiasData Management

Keywords

Quality ControlDatabases, FactualSTATISTICAL TESTSScienceGeneral Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular BiologyCONDUCTING METAANALYSESFILL METHODPREDICTIVE-DISTRIBUTIONSHumansPsychologyFUNNEL-PLOTSelection BiasData ManagementESTIMATING EFFECT SIZEQRJUDGMENT CALLSPREVALENCEData Interpretation, StatisticalMedicineBETWEEN-STUDY HETEROGENEITYGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesMonte Carlo MethodPublication BiasResearch Article

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3: 3. Good health

Additional file 1 of Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study

10.6084/m9.figshare.12276737.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study

10.6084/m9.figshare.12276737figshare

Additional file 1 of Effects of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal treatments for eating disorders: a meta-analytic inquiry into the role of patient characteristics and change in eating disorder-specific and general psychopathology in remission

10.6084/m9.figshare.14853369.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.14853369figshare

Additional file 1 of Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology

10.6084/m9.figshare.22618748.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology

10.6084/m9.figshare.22618748figshare

Additional file 1 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647451.v1figshare

Additional file 2 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647454.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647451figshare

Additional file 2 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647454figshare

Additional file 3 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647457.v1figshare

Additional file 3 of The mysterious case of the disappearing pilot study: a review of publication bias in preliminary behavioral interventions presented at health behavior conferences

10.6084/m9.figshare.23647457figshare

Additional file 1 of Effects of CYP3A4*22 and POR*28 variations on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of 18 observational studies

10.6084/m9.figshare.25157305.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Effects of CYP3A4*22 and POR*28 variations on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of 18 observational studies

10.6084/m9.figshare.25157305figshare

Additional file 1 of Reliability generalization meta-analysis of orthorexia nervosa using the ORTO-11/12/15/R scale in all populations and language versions

10.6084/m9.figshare.25440974.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Reliability generalization meta-analysis of orthorexia nervosa using the ORTO-11/12/15/R scale in all populations and language versions

10.6084/m9.figshare.25440974figshare

Additional file 2 of Reliability generalization meta-analysis of orthorexia nervosa using the ORTO-11/12/15/R scale in all populations and language versions

10.6084/m9.figshare.25441038.v1figshare

Additional file 2 of Reliability generalization meta-analysis of orthorexia nervosa using the ORTO-11/12/15/R scale in all populations and language versions

10.6084/m9.figshare.25441038figshare

Additional file 1 of Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.6084/m9.figshare.26580395.v1figshare

Additional file 1 of Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.6084/m9.figshare.26580395figshare

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis

FAIR Checklist

DataRank Breakdown

Authors (3)

Funding (4 grants)

Open Access

Topics

Linked Datasets (25)

Annotations (Europe PMC)