Racial and geographic variation in effects of maternal education and neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic status on gestational age at birth: Findings from the ECHO cohorts is a dataset published in PLoS ONE (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.5, placing it in the top 13.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 33 times, with 25 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 13% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier scheme string is given for the study's own metadata dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository name is given; the data are held by the ECHO Data Analysis Center accessible via email. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data Availability For this disseminated meta-analysis, only metadata from the participating cohorts was received by the ECHO Data Analysis Center (DAC); no individual-level data was received. Per ECHO policies, individuals requesting to use the metadata should contact [email protected]”
The statement points to contacting an individual/email, falling under Colavizza category 1 (available on request).
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“We used the categorical variable of maternal level of education as the main individual-level measure of SES... and neighborhood-level markers of SES (census tract [CT] urbanicity, percentage of black population in CT, percentage of population below the federal poverty level in CT)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset's content is described in running prose, not in an itemised inventory. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data Availability For this disseminated meta-analysis, only metadata from the participating cohorts was received by the ECHO Data Analysis Center (DAC); no individual-level data was received. Per ECHO policies, individuals requesting to use the metadata should contact [email protected]”
The only access route is a discretionary request to an email address, not a defined followable process.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
No access-level label is applied to the data; the data availability statement only describes a contact route. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are not identified as sensitive or human-subject; no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No statement about persistence or availability timing is given for the metadata.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released metadata dataset.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No named data or metadata community standard is applied to the data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for any external resource that the data depend on is provided.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is attached to the data; the article's CC BY license does not apply to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the metadata snapshot.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided; code availability is not addressed.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“UH3OD023318”
Multiple grant numbers are listed in the funding section.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
No specific instruments, kits, or software used to generate the original data are named; only analysis software is mentioned. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“S1 Table Data dictionary.”
A data dictionary is provided as supplementary material, which is a documentation object inside the article.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.529
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
1.0
From 20 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 25 citers.
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023318
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023251
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023253
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023248
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023328
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023279
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023289
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023282
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023287
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023365
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023244
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023275
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023271
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023389
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023344
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023268
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023288
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023342
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023349
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023286
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023285
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023290
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023272
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023249
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: UH3OD023337
NIH Office of the Director
Grant: U24OD023382
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: P01 ES022832
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023318
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: P30 ES030284
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: P30 ES023513
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023271
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023337
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: P50 HD105354
NINR NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NR014800
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: T32 HD049311
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023272
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: KL2 TR001065
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: P20 GM104416
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023290
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: R24 ES029490
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023282
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023285
NIH HHS
Grant: UG3 OD023249
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR002538
MeSH Terms
Additional file 1 of Using non-parametric Bayes shrinkage to assess relationships between multiple environmental and social stressors and neonatal size and body composition in the Healthy Start cohort
Additional file 1 of Using non-parametric Bayes shrinkage to assess relationships between multiple environmental and social stressors and neonatal size and body composition in the Healthy Start cohort