Physical and psychological health at adolescence and home care use later in life is a dataset published in PLoS ONE (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 78.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time. Its calibrated FAIR score is 21/100.
Ranks in the top 78% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier from a recognized scheme is given for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data requests can be submitted to the Centre for policy statistics of Statistics Netherlands: Centrum voor Beleidsstatistiek: [email protected]”
Statistics Netherlands is named as the host, but it is not a data repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Our analyses were carried out under specific confidentiality agreements with Statistics Netherlands to access non-public national mortality data linked by Statistics Netherlands to our military examination records. For additional analyses by bona-fide researchers, we can provide guidance on how they could also obtain privileged access to these data under special confidentiality agreements. We are also willing to share all scripts that were used in producing our results. Data requests can be submitted to the Centre for policy statistics of Statistics Netherlands: Centrum voor Beleidsstatistiek: [email protected] . Data requests should refer to project 7012.”
The data availability statement points to a non-repository route (request to Statistics Netherlands), not a repository record.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The records include a standardized recording of demographic and socio-economic characteristics including education, father’s occupation, along with a standardized psychometric test battery.”
The dataset content is described in running prose but not in an itemised inventory. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Our analyses were carried out under specific confidentiality agreements with Statistics Netherlands to access non-public national mortality data linked by Statistics Netherlands to our military examination records. For additional analyses by bona-fide researchers, we can provide guidance on how they could also obtain privileged access to these data under special confidentiality agreements. We are also willing to share all scripts that were used in producing our results. Data requests can be submitted to the Centre for policy statistics of Statistics Netherlands: Centrum voor Beleidsstatistiek: [email protected] . Data requests should refer to project 7012.”
The access route requires a confidentiality agreement and a request to Statistics Netherlands, which is a defined precondition.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Our analyses were carried out under specific confidentiality agreements with Statistics Netherlands to access non-public national mortality data linked by Statistics Netherlands to our military examination records.”
The paper describes the access process but does not use a standard access-level label. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/4 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data requests can be submitted to the Centre for policy statistics of Statistics Netherlands: Centrum voor Beleidsstatistiek: [email protected]”
The paper names an institutional gatekeeper (Statistics Netherlands) for data access.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state how long the data will be retained or when they are available.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named for the dataset.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for an external resource (e.g., source dataset, reference database) is provided. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is named for the data; the article-level CC BY license does not apply to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or specific date is given to pin the snapshot of the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/4 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“We are also willing to share all scripts that were used in producing our results.”
The code is offered upon request, not via a machine-resolvable locator.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“U.S. National Institute of Health grant RO1-AG028593”
An award number is provided for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Conscripts were scored (1 = fit; 2 = fairly fit; 5 = unfit) on seven health characteristics of relevance for military service, and were combined into an ABOHZIS score.”
The paper names the specific scoring method (ABOHZIS) and the Raven Progressive Matrices test, which are named instruments. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/4 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table 1 Descriptive statistics–conditions at age 18.”
Variable definitions are provided inside the article (Table 1), not in a documentation object shipped with the data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →National Institutes of Health
Grant: NIH RO1 AG028593
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG028593
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01AG028593-02
Prenatal Under Nutrition and Mortality Through Age 63 Project
Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations (ODISSEI) in the Netherlands
FWCI
0.12
Citation Percentile
0.6%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals