The relationship between family history of cancer and cancer attitudes & beliefs within the Community Initiative Towards Improving Equity and Health Status (CITIES) cohort is a dataset published in PLoS ONE (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.544, placing it in the top 35.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 6 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 36% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, accession) or URL is given for the dataset. Only a request process is described.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the data. The data are available upon request from the authors.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears in the reference list or body text. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“De-identified data will be available to access upon request with a proposal reviewed and approved by Cecilia DeGraffinreid ( [email protected] ) and a determination of exemption or approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
The statement exists but points to a person and a process, not a repository record (Colavizza category 1).
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Cancer attitudes and beliefs (CABs) were assessed with five statements: (1) “It seems like everything causes cancer; (2) there’s not much you can do to lower your chances of getting cancer; (3) there are so many different recommendations about preventing cancer, it’s hard to know which ones to follow; (4) when I think about cancer, I automatically think about death; and (5) cancer is most often caused by a person’s behavior or lifestyle.””
The dataset content is described in running prose, not as an itemised inventory. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“De-identified data will be available to access upon request with a proposal reviewed and approved by Cecilia DeGraffinreid ( [email protected] ) and a determination of exemption or approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
The text gives a specified, followable process (proposal, IRB, DUA) that carries a precondition.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“De-identified data will be available to access upon request with a proposal reviewed and approved by Cecilia DeGraffinreid ( [email protected] ) and a determination of exemption or approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). Upon receipt of the approvals, a Data Use Agreement will be completed.”
The paper describes the access action but does not explicitly label the access level using a standard vocabulary term. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“a determination of exemption or approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). Upon receipt of the approvals, a Data Use Agreement will be completed.”
The text names an Institutional Review Board and a Data Use Agreement, which are institutional gatekeepers. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“De-identified data will be available to access upon request with a proposal reviewed and approved by Cecilia DeGraffinreid ( [email protected] ) and a determination of exemption or approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
The text does not state how long the data will be available or any retention commitment.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, ontology) is named.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for an external resource (e.g., source dataset, reference genome, code) is provided.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence or terms document is named for the data. The CC BY licence applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date pins a snapshot of the released data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability statement or locator is provided.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This project was supported by The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center using Pelotonia funds and a supplement to the National Cancer Institute Grant P30 CA016058, The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Grant UL1TR00273), and the Recruitment, Intervention and Survey Shared Resource (RISSR) at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (funded by the National Cancer Institute Grant P30 CA016058). This work was also supported by the Samuel J. Roessler Memorial Scholarship through The Ohio State University College of Medicine’s Medical Student Research Program Scholarship (To LL) and the National Cancer Institute (F99CA25374501 to XZ).”
Multiple grant numbers (P30CA016058, UL1TR00273, F99CA25374501) are provided with funder names.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Survey data was collected and managed with REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure web-based data collection and survey system hosted by The Ohio State University.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The text names REDCap as a proper-noun platform used for data collection. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, codebook) is named as accompanying the data, and no variable-definition table exists inside the article. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.292
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.252
From 3 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 6 citers.
National Cancer Institute
Grant: P30CA016058
Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science
Grant: UL1TR002733
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Grant: Pelotonia Funds
College of Medicine Office of Research, Ohio State University
Grant: Samuel J. Roessler Memorial Scholarship
National Cancer Institute
Grant: F99CA25374501
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: K00 CA253745
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: F99 CA253745
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1ZIATR000273-03
Advanced development of human KDM5 inhibitors (Chemical Biology Consortium/NCI Experimental Therapeutics Collaboration)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30CA016058-15S1
CORE--HORMONE RECEPTOR LABORATORY
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UL1TR002733-02
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve Health
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords