Cognitive Performance and Incident Alzheimer's Dementia in Men Versus Women is a dataset published in The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.481, placing it in the top 39.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 17 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 2/100.
Ranks in the top 40% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier is assigned to the study's own data; the only identifiers are for the paper and the NACC database. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the study's own data; the NACC database is mentioned as the source of the data used. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own data appears in the text or reference list. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Availability of Data and Materials: For further information on access to the NACC database, please contact NACC ( https://naccdata.org/ ).”
The data availability statement directs users to contact NACC for access, not to a repository record. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
No itemised inventory of the study's own dataset is provided; only analysis results are presented in tables.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
No access route is provided for the study's own data; the only statement directs to the NACC database for the source data.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
No access-level label is applied to the study's own data; the only access statement refers to the third-party NACC database.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
No gatekeeper is named for the study's own data; the ethical oversight mentioned pertains to the source NACC data collection. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No timing or persistence commitment is made for the study's own data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the study's own data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“Study reporting adhered to the STROBE reporting recommendations (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only named standard is the STROBE manuscript reporting guideline, not a data or metadata standard. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“For further information on access to the NACC database, please contact NACC ( https://naccdata.org/ ).”
The paper provides a URL identifier for the NACC database, a resource on which the study's own data depend. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The only license mentioned is for the article itself, not for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the study's own data; the data freeze refers to the source NACC data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided for the study's own code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work is supported by the Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence in Alzheimer’s Disease including significant contributions from the Richman Family Foundation, the Rick Sharp Alzheimer’s Foundation, the Sharp Family Foundation and others.”
The paper names the Richman Family Foundation as a funder but does not provide an award number for the study. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Software Version 26 (Chicago, IL, USA).”
The paper names the specific software used to produce the analytical data. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The paper does not mention any codebook or data dictionary accompanying the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not mention any codebook or data dictionary accompanying the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.434
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0472
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P20 AG068053
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066515
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG062421
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066508
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066519
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072973
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066462
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066530
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066509
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P20 AG068077
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066546
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072972
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072979
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P20 AG068082
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072975
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066444
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066507
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072946
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066518
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066511
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U24 AG072122
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066512
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072978
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG062429
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG062422
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG079280
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072977
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG062677
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P20 AG068024
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072958
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG062715
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066506
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066468
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072976
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072947
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072931
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG066514
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072959
FWCI
3.22
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals