Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Rethinking Peer Review: Enhancing Reliability in Scholarly Publishing

Rethinking Peer Review: Enhancing Reliability in Scholarly Publishing(2025)10.14293/ease.2025.006Source: DataRank Database

Rethinking Peer Review: Enhancing Reliability in Scholarly Publishing is a research paper published in Rethinking Peer Review: Enhancing Reliability in Scholarly Publishing (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

0 citations

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (5)

Michael Thelwall ORCID,Ludo Waltman ORCID,Bahar Mehmani ORCID,Laura Sheard ORCID,Jadranka Stojanovski ORCID