Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement

American Journal of Public Health(2004)10.2105/ajph.94.3.361Source: DataRank Database

Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement is a research paper published in American Journal of Public Health (2004). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 20.4. It has been cited 2,633 times, with 200 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

20.4DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

2,633 citations · 200 citing works in its network

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:OA: greenTopics (44)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 6%Citation Network 94%

Base Score Contribution

1.2

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

19.3

From 200 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 5 citers driving the network score

Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(C_q) divided by its reference count — out of 200 citers.

Communication at the Core of Effective Public Health
American Journal of Public Health2004257 citations5 referencesContributes 1.111
TREND Reporting Guidelines for Nonrandomized/Quasi-Experimental Study Designs
JAMA Surgery2021119 citations6 referencesContributes 0.798
Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?
American Psychologist2008572 citations17 referencesContributes 0.374
Sanitary Pad Interventions for Girls' Education in Ghana: A Pilot Study
PLoS ONE2012229 citations15 referencesContributes 0.363
The Importance of External Validity
American Journal of Public Health2007295 citations19 referencesContributes 0.299

Authors (3)

Cynthia Lyles,Nicole Crepaz ORCID,Don C. Des Jarlais ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:14998794 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W2110448405

green

repositoryhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1448256

publisherhttps://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.361

journalhttps://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.361

repositoryhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14998794

Fields of Study

Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsBehavioral ResearchDecision MakingEpidemiologic Research DesignEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInformation DisseminationPeriodicals as TopicProgram EvaluationPublic Health PracticePublishingQuality ControlRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

MeSH Terms

Decision MakingHumansPeriodicals as TopicPublishingQuality ControlEpidemiologic Research DesignProgram EvaluationPublic Health PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineInformation DisseminationBehavioral Research

Keywords

Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsCLARITYMedicinePsychological interventionStatement (logic)Research designPublic healthClinical study designRandomized controlled trialPublic health interventionsAlternative medicineIntervention (counseling)MEDLINEQuality (philosophy)Family medicineClinical trialNursing