Parkinson’s Disease Case Ascertainment in the Sister Study: A Cohort for Environmental Health Research is a dataset published in Journal of Parkinson s Disease (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.358, placing it in the top 49.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 6 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 29/100.
Ranks in the top 50% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm”
The paper gives a web URL (not a PID scheme) as the data location. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The data that support findings from this study are available from the Sister Study, following appropriate approval procedures as detailed at https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm .”
The named holder is the Sister Study, a cohort study and not a repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier or link for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, either in the body text or the reference list. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support findings from this study are available from the Sister Study, following appropriate approval procedures as detailed at https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a third-party host (Sister Study) with a defined process, not to a repository record, placing it in the 'partial' class (Colavizza category 1 or 3? Actually, it is not a public repository link, so partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not contain an itemised inventory or structural description of the dataset; it only describes the study findings and methods. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The data that support findings from this study are available from the Sister Study, following appropriate approval procedures as detailed at https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm .”
The access route carries a stated precondition (approval procedure), so it is not unconditional. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support findings from this study are available from the Sister Study, following appropriate approval procedures as detailed at https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not label the access level (e.g. 'open access'), but describes an action (approval procedure) from which restricted access is inferred. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data that support findings from this study are available from the Sister Study, following appropriate approval procedures as detailed at https://sisterstudy.niehs.nih.gov/English/collaboration.htm.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The Sister Study is named as the institutional gatekeeper that must be followed for approval, satisfying the 'institutional gatekeeper' class. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence addresses when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named; only a reference to a GWAS meta-analysis (not a standard applied to the data). [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for a non-own resource (e.g., source dataset, reference genome, code) is provided.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence is stated for the data; the CC BY-NC 4.0 applies to the article only.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date identifies the snapshot of the data used or released.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided; only SAS 9.4 is named as analysis software, but no code is shared.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study is supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Parkinson’s Research Program (W81XWH-17-1-0536) and the Parkinson’s Foundation (PF-IMP-1825), and in part by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES044005) and National Institute on Aging (ZO1-AG000949). Dr. Chen is also supported by grants from NIA (R01AG071517) and NIEHS (R01ES029227).”
Multiple award numbers are given with named funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
No specific instruments, assays, or software are named for producing the data; only generic methods described. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The study assessed 18 PD nonmotor symptoms in its second and/or third DFU via structured questionnaires and self-reports ( Supplementary Table 2 ).”
Variable definitions are provided in a supplementary table within the article, not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.292
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0662
From 4 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG071517
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 ES029227
Intramural NIH HHS
Grant: Z01 AG000949
Intramural NIH HHS
Grant: Z01 ES044005
NIEHS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 ES019672
FWCI
1.10
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords